[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

vinoyang updated HUDI-354:
--------------------------
    Description: 
This is an umbrella issue used to track apply some stricter comment and code 
style validation rules for the whole project. The rules list below:
 # All public classes must add class-level comments;
 # All comments must end with a clear "."
 # In the import statement of the class, clearly distinguish (by blank lines) 
the import of Java SE and the import of non-java SE. Currently, I saw at least 
two projects(Spark and Flink) that implement this rule. Flink implements 
stricter rules than Spark. It is divided into several blocks from top to 
bottom(owner import -> non-owner and non-JavaSE import -> Java SE import -> 
static import), each block are sorted according to the natural sequence of 
letters;
 # Reconfirm the method and whether the comment is consistency;

Each project sub-module mappings to one subtask.

How to find all the invalidated points?
 * Add the XML code snippet into {{PROJECT_ROOT/style/checkstyle.xml}} : 

{code:java}
<module name="TreeWalker">

    <!-- add the below modules-->

    <!-- JAVADOC CHECKS -->
<module name="JavadocStyle">
    <property name="severity" value="error"/>
</module>
<module name="JavadocType">
    <property name="scope" value="protected"/>
    <property name="severity" value="error"/>
    <property name="allowMissingParamTags" value="true"/>
</module>
<module name="ImportOrder">
    <!-- Checks for out of order import statements. -->
    <property name="severity" value="error"/>
    <property name="groups" value="org.apache.hudi,*,javax,java,scala"/>
    <property name="separated" value="true"/>
    <property name="sortStaticImportsAlphabetically" value="true"/>
    <property name="option" value="bottom"/>
    <property name="tokens" value="STATIC_IMPORT, IMPORT"/>
    <message key="import.ordering"
      value="Import {0} appears after other imports that it should precede"/>
</module>
<module name="RedundantImport">
    <!-- Checks for redundant import statements. -->
    <property name="severity" value="error"/>
    <message key="import.redundancy"
      value="Redundant import {0}."/>
</module>
<module name="AvoidStarImport">
    <property name="severity" value="error"/>
</module>
</module>{code}
 *  Make sure you have installed CheckStyle-IDEA plugin and activated for the 
project.
 * Scan the project module you want to refactor and fix all the issues one by 
one.

 

  was:
This is an umbrella issue used to track apply some stricter comment and code 
style validation rules for the whole project. The rules list below:
 # All public classes must add class-level comments;
 # All comments must end with a clear "."
 # In the import statement of the class, clearly distinguish (by blank lines) 
the import of Java SE and the import of non-java SE. Currently, I saw at least 
two projects(Spark and Flink) that implement this rule. Flink implements 
stricter rules than Spark. It is divided into several blocks from top to 
bottom(owner import -> non-owner and non-JavaSE import -> Java SE import -> 
static import), each block are sorted according to the natural sequence of 
letters;
 # Reconfirm the method and whether the comment is consistency;

Each project sub-module mappings to one subtask.

How to find all the invalidated points?
 * Add the XML code snippet into {{PROJECT_ROOT/style/checkstyle.xml}} : 

{code:java}
<module name="TreeWalker">

    <!-- add the below modules-->

    <!-- JAVADOC CHECKS -->
<module name="JavadocStyle">
    <property name="severity" value="info"/>
</module>
<module name="JavadocType">
    <property name="scope" value="protected"/>
    <property name="severity" value="info"/>
    <property name="allowMissingParamTags" value="true"/>
</module>
<module name="ImportOrder">
    <!-- Checks for out of order import statements. -->
    <property name="severity" value="info"/>
    <property name="groups" value="org.apache.hudi,*,javax,java,scala"/>
    <property name="separated" value="true"/>
    <property name="sortStaticImportsAlphabetically" value="true"/>
    <property name="option" value="bottom"/>
    <property name="tokens" value="STATIC_IMPORT, IMPORT"/>
    <message key="import.ordering"
      value="Import {0} appears after other imports that it should precede"/>
</module>
<module name="RedundantImport">
    <!-- Checks for redundant import statements. -->
    <property name="severity" value="info"/>
    <message key="import.redundancy"
      value="Redundant import {0}."/>
</module>
<module name="AvoidStarImport">
    <property name="severity" value="info"/>
</module>
</module>{code}
 *  Make sure you have installed CheckStyle-IDEA plugin and activated for the 
project.
 * Scan the project module you want to refactor and fix all the issues one by 
one.

 


> Introduce stricter comment and code style validation rules
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HUDI-354
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-354
>             Project: Apache Hudi (incubating)
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: vinoyang
>            Priority: Major
>
> This is an umbrella issue used to track apply some stricter comment and code 
> style validation rules for the whole project. The rules list below:
>  # All public classes must add class-level comments;
>  # All comments must end with a clear "."
>  # In the import statement of the class, clearly distinguish (by blank lines) 
> the import of Java SE and the import of non-java SE. Currently, I saw at 
> least two projects(Spark and Flink) that implement this rule. Flink 
> implements stricter rules than Spark. It is divided into several blocks from 
> top to bottom(owner import -> non-owner and non-JavaSE import -> Java SE 
> import -> static import), each block are sorted according to the natural 
> sequence of letters;
>  # Reconfirm the method and whether the comment is consistency;
> Each project sub-module mappings to one subtask.
> How to find all the invalidated points?
>  * Add the XML code snippet into {{PROJECT_ROOT/style/checkstyle.xml}} : 
> {code:java}
> <module name="TreeWalker">
>     <!-- add the below modules-->
>     <!-- JAVADOC CHECKS -->
> <module name="JavadocStyle">
>     <property name="severity" value="error"/>
> </module>
> <module name="JavadocType">
>     <property name="scope" value="protected"/>
>     <property name="severity" value="error"/>
>     <property name="allowMissingParamTags" value="true"/>
> </module>
> <module name="ImportOrder">
>     <!-- Checks for out of order import statements. -->
>     <property name="severity" value="error"/>
>     <property name="groups" value="org.apache.hudi,*,javax,java,scala"/>
>     <property name="separated" value="true"/>
>     <property name="sortStaticImportsAlphabetically" value="true"/>
>     <property name="option" value="bottom"/>
>     <property name="tokens" value="STATIC_IMPORT, IMPORT"/>
>     <message key="import.ordering"
>       value="Import {0} appears after other imports that it should precede"/>
> </module>
> <module name="RedundantImport">
>     <!-- Checks for redundant import statements. -->
>     <property name="severity" value="error"/>
>     <message key="import.redundancy"
>       value="Redundant import {0}."/>
> </module>
> <module name="AvoidStarImport">
>     <property name="severity" value="error"/>
> </module>
> </module>{code}
>  *  Make sure you have installed CheckStyle-IDEA plugin and activated for the 
> project.
>  * Scan the project module you want to refactor and fix all the issues one by 
> one.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to