[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17019265#comment-17019265
 ] 

vinoyang edited comment on HUDI-538 at 1/20/20 7:14 AM:
--------------------------------------------------------

[~vinoth] OK, another thing we may need to consider. Based on our discussion, 
we agreed on put {{hudi-utilities}} aside. However, for both Flink and Spark, 
they follow {{source -> transform -> sink}} mode. Currently, the sources host 
in {{hudi-utilities}} package and they are not Spark-free. So, it seems we also 
need to consider it. WDYT?


was (Author: yanghua):
[~vinoth] OK, another thing we may need to consider. Based on our discussion, 
we agreed on put {{hudi-utilities}} aside. However, for both Flink and Spark, 
they observe {{source -> transform -> sink}} mode. Currently, the sources host 
in {{hudi-utilities}} package and they are not Spark-free. So, it seems we also 
need to consider it. WDYT?

> Restructuring hudi client module for multi engine support
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HUDI-538
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-538
>             Project: Apache Hudi (incubating)
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: Code Cleanup
>            Reporter: vinoyang
>            Priority: Major
>
> Hudi is currently tightly coupled with the Spark framework. It caused the 
> integration with other computing engine more difficult. We plan to decouple 
> it with Spark. This umbrella issue used to track this work.
> Some thoughts wrote here: 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Q9w_4K6xzGbUrtTS0gAlzNYOmRXjzNUdbbe0q59PX9w/edit?usp=sharing
> The feature branch is {{restructure-hudi-client}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to