[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-2596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ethan Guo updated HUDI-2596:
----------------------------
Description: Currently we have different naming convention for the abstract
classes, such as AbstractBulkInsertHelper, BaseCommitActionExecutor,
HoodieTableFileIndexBase, etc. Ideally, we should have the same naming
convention for such common abstraction/interface, "Abstract*", "Base*", or
"\*Base"{*}.{*} I prefer to use "Base\*". (was: Currently we have different
naming convention for the abstract classes, such as AbstractBulkInsertHelper,
BaseCommitActionExecutor, HoodieTableFileIndexBase, etc. Ideally, we should
have the same naming convention for such common abstraction/interface,
"Abstract*", "Base*", or "*Base". I prefer to use "Base*".)
> Make class names consistent in hudi-client
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HUDI-2596
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-2596
> Project: Apache Hudi
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Code Cleanup
> Reporter: Ethan Guo
> Assignee: Raymond Xu
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 0.11.0
>
>
> Currently we have different naming convention for the abstract classes, such
> as AbstractBulkInsertHelper, BaseCommitActionExecutor,
> HoodieTableFileIndexBase, etc. Ideally, we should have the same naming
> convention for such common abstraction/interface, "Abstract*", "Base*", or
> "\*Base"{*}.{*} I prefer to use "Base\*".
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
