nsivabalan commented on pull request #4749: URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/4749#issuecomment-1033159091
thanks Sagar for bringing up a good point. Just playing devil's advocate. Spark in general has much incompatability issues even after being very mature. So, for the benefit we get (same behavior across bulk insert and other operations), I am thinking if we can go ahead with this change. Again, my assumption is that w/ non row writer operations, we are already honoring micro secs with timestamp type. Even today, users have some inconsistencies here which they are living with. especially given this is not affecting partition path flow. just some random timestamp type fields. @YannByron : correct me if I am mistaken in any of the above statements. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
