yuzhaojing commented on a change in pull request #4309: URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/4309#discussion_r825856060
########## File path: rfc/rfc-43/rfc-43.md ########## @@ -0,0 +1,222 @@ +<!-- + Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more + contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with + this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. + The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 + (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with + the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + + http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + + Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software + distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, + WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. + See the License for the specific language governing permissions and + limitations under the License. +--> +# RFC-43: Implement Compaction/Clustering Service for Hudi + +## Proposers +- @yuzhaojing + +## Approvers +- @garyli1019 +- @leesf +- @vinothchandar + +## Status +JIRA: [https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3016](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-3016) + +## Abstract + +Hudi table needs compaction/clustering to rewrite data. Currently, schedule compaction/clustering job provides Three ways: + +- Inline, execute compaction/clustering job and writing job in the same application, perform the compaction/clustering job and writing job serially. + +- Async, execute compaction/clustering job and writing job in the same application, Async parallel execution of compaction/clustering job and write job. + +- Independent compaction/clustering job, execute an async compaction/clustering job of another application. + +With the increase in the number of HUDI tables, due to a lack of management capabilities, maintenance costs will become higher. This proposal is to implement an independent compaction/clustering Service to manage the Hudi compaction/clustering job. + +## Background + +In the current implementation, if the HUDI table needs do compact/cluster, it only has three ways: + +1. Use inline compaction/clustering, in this mode the job will be block writing job. + +2. Using Async compaction/clustering, in this mode the job execute async but also sharing the resource with HUDI to write a job that may affect the stability of job writing, which is not what the user wants to see. + +3. Using independent compaction/clustering job is a better way to schedule the job, in this mode the job execute async and do not sharing resources with writing job, but also has some questions: Review comment: Yes, it is very critical! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
