tjtoll commented on issue #4682: URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/issues/4682#issuecomment-1081075819
@rkkalluri I'm actually around this issue now in 0.9 and 0.10. When I switched from using a timestamp type partition and removed my hoodie.copyonwrite.record.size.estimate parameter, these stages improved to similar to 0.8 performance. Also, we were able to get .11 built but encountered some issues. We received hive sync errors (we use glue schema registry) on the small table we tried, just to see if it worked at all. We attempted to run it for a large table and ran into the same issue. We may not get time to take another crack at it as our sprint work is taking priority for the moment. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
