danny0405 commented on PR #5201: URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/5201#issuecomment-1098029916
> > I would suggest to revert this PR before we reach unified conclusion. > > @danny0405 BigQuery requires tables not to store partition columns on the parquet files when there are physical partition paths. To support reading from BigQuery, we're to enable this config, which was introduced long time back. As for this PR itself, it's only meant to fix bugs of the behaviors when this is enabled. Shouldn’t the BigQuery inputformat adapter the dataset with partition columns? And why bring in the complexities to the writer/reader of spark based on little gains. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
