[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-93?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17058590#comment-17058590
]
Pratyaksh Sharma commented on HUDI-93:
--------------------------------------
[~xleesf] [~nishith29] How do we plan to go ahead with this? Any thoughts on
how can we enforce the semantic?
> Enforce semantics on HoodieRecordPayload to allow for a consistent
> instantiation of custom payloads via reflection
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HUDI-93
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-93
> Project: Apache Hudi (incubating)
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Common Core
> Reporter: Nishith Agarwal
> Assignee: Pratyaksh Sharma
> Priority: Major
>
> At the moment, the expectation is that any implementation of
> HoodieRecordPayload needs to have a constructor with Optional<GenericRecord>.
> But this is not enforced in the HoodieRecordPayload interface. We require a
> method to enforce a semantic that works consistently.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
