[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17062945#comment-17062945
]
Vinoth Chandar commented on HUDI-686:
-------------------------------------
[~vbalaji] [~shivnarayan] Please review this information closely.. In short, we
can support an indexing option that eliminates memory caching, but not sure if
that will outperform current BloomIndex. Is it worth cleaning this
implementation up and checking it in?
> Implement BloomIndexV2 that does not depend on memory caching
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HUDI-686
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-686
> Project: Apache Hudi (incubating)
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Index, Performance
> Reporter: Vinoth Chandar
> Assignee: Vinoth Chandar
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 0.6.0
>
> Attachments: Screen Shot 2020-03-19 at 10.15.10 AM.png, Screen Shot
> 2020-03-19 at 10.15.10 AM.png, Screen Shot 2020-03-19 at 10.15.10 AM.png,
> image-2020-03-19-10-17-43-048.png
>
>
> Main goals here is to provide a much simpler index, without advanced
> optimizations like auto tuned parallelism/skew handling but a better
> out-of-experience for small workloads.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
