yihua commented on code in PR #6155:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/6155#discussion_r928053379
##########
hudi-hadoop-mr/src/main/java/org/apache/hudi/hadoop/utils/HoodieRealtimeRecordReaderUtils.java:
##########
@@ -189,7 +190,13 @@ public static Writable avroToArrayWritable(Object value,
Schema schema) {
Writable[] recordValues = new Writable[schema.getFields().size()];
int recordValueIndex = 0;
for (Schema.Field field : schema.getFields()) {
- recordValues[recordValueIndex++] =
avroToArrayWritable(record.get(field.name()), field.schema());
+ Object fieldValue = null;
+ try {
+ fieldValue = record.get(field.name());
+ } catch (AvroRuntimeException e) {
+ LOG.debug("Field:" + field.name() + "not found in Schema:" +
schema.toString());
Review Comment:
It makes sense to me now. If the existing behavior is to return null, then
this is OK. @rahil-c could you create a ticket for revisiting the performance?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
