[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-5828?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17692154#comment-17692154
]
kazdy commented on HUDI-5828:
-----------------------------
Regarding point 5, in spark there are two apis worth taking a look at:
df.toTable(tablename, hudi)
df.saveAsTable(tablename, hudi)
when using these, spark creates table in metastore as well.
Wouldn't it be cleaner to start pointing users at saveAsTable() and for save()
api require users to provide table name?
> Support df.write.forma("hudi") with out any additional options
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HUDI-5828
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-5828
> Project: Apache Hudi
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: writer-core
> Reporter: sivabalan narayanan
> Priority: Major
>
> Wrt simplifying the usage of hudi among more users, we should try to see if
> we can support writing to hudi w/o any options during write.
>
> For eg, we can do the following with paruqet writes.
> {code:java}
> df.write.format("parquet").save(path)
> {code}
>
> So, for a non-partitioned dataset, we should try if we can support this
> usability.
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
