xushiyan commented on code in PR #4913:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/4913#discussion_r1205864459
##########
hudi-client/hudi-spark-client/src/test/java/org/apache/hudi/table/functional/TestMarkerBasedRollbackStrategy.java:
##########
@@ -87,18 +88,58 @@ public void tearDown() throws Exception {
@Test
public void testMarkerBasedRollbackAppend() throws Exception {
+ tearDown();
+ tableType = HoodieTableType.MERGE_ON_READ;
+ setUp();
HoodieTestTable testTable = HoodieTestTable.of(metaClient);
String f0 = testTable.addRequestedCommit("000")
.getFileIdsWithBaseFilesInPartitions("partA").get("partA");
testTable.forCommit("001")
- .withMarkerFile("partA", f0, IOType.APPEND);
+ .withLogMarkerFile("partA", f0, IOType.CREATE);
HoodieTable hoodieTable = HoodieSparkTable.create(getConfig(), context,
metaClient);
List<HoodieRollbackRequest> rollbackRequests = new
MarkerBasedRollbackStrategy(hoodieTable, context, getConfig(),
"002").getRollbackRequests(new
HoodieInstant(HoodieInstant.State.INFLIGHT, HoodieTimeline.COMMIT_ACTION,
"001"));
assertEquals(1, rollbackRequests.size());
}
+ @Test
+ public void testMarkerBasedRollbackAppendWithLogFileMarkers() throws
Exception {
+ tearDown();
+ tableType = HoodieTableType.MERGE_ON_READ;
Review Comment:
if just initMetaClient(tableType) in each testcase should fix the problem.
for some testcases, may both table types apply?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
