[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-4756?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17755708#comment-17755708
]
Lin Liu commented on HUDI-4756:
-------------------------------
Talked with [~shivnarayan] offline, who confirmed that this task has been there
for a while, and it is a bit tricky to figure out if this configuration has
been used in prod. Therefore, we will check the impact of this configuration in
few cases in next step:
# Set it to false for non-date-partitioned table, and then set it to true.
# Set it to true for date-partitioned table and then set it to false.
# Set it to false for date-partitioned table and then set it to true.
# Set it to true for date-partitioned table and then set it to false.
> Clean up usages of "assume.date.partition" config within hudi
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HUDI-4756
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-4756
> Project: Apache Hudi
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: configs
> Reporter: sivabalan narayanan
> Assignee: Lin Liu
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 1.0.0
>
>
> looks like "assume.date.partition" is not used anywhere within hudi. lets
> clean up the usages.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
