danny0405 commented on issue #10508:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/issues/10508#issuecomment-1897703822

   @parisni We made this change for these reasons:
   
   1. composite the field name with single key does not make sense
   2. it is not consistent with the simple key generator, that means, when user 
switchs from simple to complex key generator, the old primary key does not work.
   3. also it makes the caller more complex from code, because it needs to 
distinguish whether the key generator is simple or not to decode the record key 
(especially the natvie code from different engines)
   4. 1.0 is a good chance to introduce breaking change.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to