[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-8426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Y Ethan Guo updated HUDI-8426:
------------------------------
    Description: 
[https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/11943#discussion_r1809691906]

Every config key goes through shouldIgnoreConfig check.  For config keys that 
do not require checks, we should just exclude them from "params" first.
{code:java}
params.foreach { case (key, value) =>
  if (!shouldIgnoreConfig(key, value, params)) {
    val existingValue = getStringFromTableConfigWithAlternatives(tableConfig, 
key)
    if (null != existingValue && !resolver(existingValue, value)) {
      diffConfigs.append(s"$key:\t$value\t${tableConfig.getString(key)}\n")
    }
  }
} {code}
 

> Optimize shouldIgnoreConfig check in HoodieWriterUtils
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HUDI-8426
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-8426
>             Project: Apache Hudi
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Y Ethan Guo
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.1.0
>
>
> [https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/11943#discussion_r1809691906]
> Every config key goes through shouldIgnoreConfig check.  For config keys that 
> do not require checks, we should just exclude them from "params" first.
> {code:java}
> params.foreach { case (key, value) =>
>   if (!shouldIgnoreConfig(key, value, params)) {
>     val existingValue = getStringFromTableConfigWithAlternatives(tableConfig, 
> key)
>     if (null != existingValue && !resolver(existingValue, value)) {
>       diffConfigs.append(s"$key:\t$value\t${tableConfig.getString(key)}\n")
>     }
>   }
> } {code}
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to