wangxianghu commented on a change in pull request #1827:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/1827#discussion_r484832824



##########
File path: hudi-client/pom.xml
##########
@@ -68,6 +107,12 @@
   </build>
 
   <dependencies>
+    <!-- Scala -->
+    <dependency>
+      <groupId>org.scala-lang</groupId>

Review comment:
       > should we limit scala to just the spark module?
   
   Yes, it is better. can we do it in another PR?
   because although some classes have nothing to do with spark, it used 
`scala.Tuple2`, so scala is still needed. 
   we can replace it with 'org.apache.hudi.common.util.collection.Pair'
   WDYT?




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to