[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-8490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kate Huber updated HUDI-8490:
-----------------------------
Sprint: Hudi 1.0 Blockers+Bugs Sprint
> Remove table name from the lock key used by lock provider
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HUDI-8490
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-8490
> Project: Apache Hudi
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Davis Zhang
> Priority: Blocker
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 1.0.0
>
>
> For implicit lock provider, the lock key is derived as <tablename>-<hash of
> table basepath>
> this is problematic in case of alter table rename, some writers are using the
> old lock key while others are using the new one, which leads to concurrency
> bug as the lock fails to synchronize operations from concurrent operators.
> Alter rename should not have coupling with locks, so to remove the
> dependency, we removed the table name from the lock key for both implicit ddb
> and zookeeper lock provider.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
