the-other-tim-brown commented on code in PR #12272:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/12272#discussion_r1846613292
##########
hudi-client/hudi-client-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hudi/client/utils/TransactionUtils.java:
##########
@@ -71,12 +71,12 @@ public static Option<HoodieCommitMetadata>
resolveWriteConflictIfAny(
WriteOperationType operationType =
thisCommitMetadata.map(HoodieCommitMetadata::getOperationType).orElse(null);
if (config.needResolveWriteConflict(operationType)) {
// deal with pendingInstants
- Stream<HoodieInstant> completedInstantsDuringCurrentWriteOperation =
getCompletedInstantsDuringCurrentWriteOperation(table.getMetaClient(),
pendingInstants);
-
- ConflictResolutionStrategy resolutionStrategy =
config.getWriteConflictResolutionStrategy();
if (reloadActiveTimeline) {
table.getMetaClient().reloadActiveTimeline();
}
+ Stream<HoodieInstant> completedInstantsDuringCurrentWriteOperation =
getCompletedInstantsDuringCurrentWriteOperation(table.getMetaClient(),
pendingInstants);
Review Comment:
Yes, as Vinoth has pointed out this is not required because it is reloaded
within the lock already. That is why there is a parameter on the method.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
