codope commented on code in PR #12447:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/12447#discussion_r1888492001


##########
hudi-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hudi/metadata/HoodieBackedTableMetadata.java:
##########
@@ -919,4 +886,42 @@ private Map<String, HoodieRecord<HoodieMetadataPayload>> 
fetchBaseFileAllRecords
       return 
SecondaryIndexKeyUtils.getRecordKeyFromSecondaryIndexKey(record.getRecordKey());
     }, record -> record));
   }
+
+  @VisibleForTesting
+  public static Map<String, String> 
reverseLookupSecondaryKeysInternal(List<String> recordKeys,
+                                                                       
Map<String, HoodieRecord<HoodieMetadataPayload>> baseFileRecords,
+                                                                       
HoodieMetadataLogRecordReader logRecordScanner) {
+    Map<String, String> recordKeyMap = new HashMap<>();
+    Set<String> keySet = new TreeSet<>(recordKeys);
+    Set<String> deletedRecordsFromLogs = new HashSet<>();
+    Map<String, HoodieRecord<HoodieMetadataPayload>> logRecordsMap = new 
HashMap<>();
+    // Note that: we read the log records from the oldest to the latest!!!
+    // If we change the read order, we need update the following logic 
accordingly.
+    logRecordScanner.getRecords().forEach(record -> {
+      String recordKey = 
SecondaryIndexKeyUtils.getRecordKeyFromSecondaryIndexKey(record.getRecordKey());
+      HoodieMetadataPayload payload = record.getData();
+      if (!payload.isDeleted()) { // process only valid records.
+        if (keySet.contains(recordKey)) {
+          logRecordsMap.put(recordKey, record);

Review Comment:
   I think it's ok because the log records are handled in temporal order so it 
won't be treated as deleted.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to