danny0405 commented on code in PR #12514:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/12514#discussion_r1891173324


##########
rfc/rfc-83/rfc-83.md:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,260 @@
+<!--
+  Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+  contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
+  this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+  The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+  (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+  the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+
+       http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+
+  Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+  distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+  WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+  See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+  limitations under the License.
+-->
+# RFC-83: Incremental Table Service
+
+## Proposers
+
+- @zhangyue19921010
+
+## Approvers
+- @danny0405
+- @yuzhaojing
+
+## Status
+
+JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-8780
+
+## Abstract
+
+In Hudi, when scheduling Compaction and Clustering, the default behavior is to 
scan all partitions under the current table. 
+When there are many historical partitions, such as 640,000 in our production 
environment, this scanning and planning operation becomes very inefficient. 
+For Flink, it often leads to checkpoint timeouts, resulting in data delays.
+As for cleaning, we already have the ability to do cleaning for incremental 
partitions.
+
+This RFC will draw on the design of Incremental Clean to generalize the 
capability of processing incremental partitions to all table services, such as 
Clustering and Compaction.
+
+## Background
+
+`earliestInstantToRetain` in clean plan meta
+
+HoodieCleanerPlan.avsc
+
+```text
+{
+  "namespace": "org.apache.hudi.avro.model",
+  "type": "record",
+  "name": "HoodieCleanerPlan",
+  "fields": [
+    {
+      "name": "earliestInstantToRetain",
+      "type":["null", {
+        "type": "record",
+        "name": "HoodieActionInstant",
+        "fields": [
+          {
+            "name": "timestamp",
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "action",
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "state",
+            "type": "string"
+          }
+        ]
+      }],
+      "default" : null
+    },
+    xxxx
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+`EarliestCommitToReta` in clean commit meta
+
+HoodieCleanMetadata.avsc
+
+```text
+{"namespace": "org.apache.hudi.avro.model",
+ "type": "record",
+ "name": "HoodieCleanMetadata",
+ "fields": [
+     xxxx,
+     {"name": "earliestCommitToRetain", "type": "string"},
+     xxxx
+ ]
+}
+```
+How to get incremental partitions during cleaning
+
+![cleanIncrementalpartitions.png](cleanIncrementalpartitions.png)
+
+**Note**
+`EarliestCommitToRetain` is recorded in `HoodieCleanMetadata`
+newInstantToRetain is computed based on Clean configs such as 
`hoodie.clean.commits.retained` and will be record in clean meta as new 
EarliestCommitToRetain
+
+## Design And Implementation
+
+### Current Table Service Plan AND Execute Logic
+
+![currentTableServiceDiagram.png](currentTableServiceDiagram.png)
+
+### Changes in TableService Metadata Schema
+
+Add new column `earliestInstantToRetain` in Clustering/Compaction plan same as 
`earliestInstantToRetain` in clean plan
+
+```text
+    {
+      "name": "earliestInstantToRetain",
+      "type":["null", {
+        "type": "record",
+        "name": "HoodieActionInstant",
+        "fields": [
+          {
+            "name": "timestamp",
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "action",
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          {
+            "name": "state",
+            "type": "string"
+          }
+        ]
+      }],
+      "default" : null
+    },
+```
+
+Add `EarliestCommitToReta` in HoodieCommitMetadata extra meta MAP for 
clustering and compaction operation which are all written-commit
+
+```text
+{"name": "earliestCommitToRetain", "type": "string"}
+```
+
+We also need a unified interface/abstract-class to control the Plan behavior 
and Commit behavior of the TableService.

Review Comment:
   Can you elaborate why this is needed?



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to