wombatu-kun commented on PR #12795: URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/12795#issuecomment-2655837845
> @geserdugarov I believe the abstraction of readers and writers proposed here is not in conflict with performance, specifically, the Flink performance issue you mentioned (serde cost of Flink shuffling and memory issue), it seems they are orthogonal from my side. Exactly! This RFC-88 and RFC-84 (proposed by @geserdugarov) are about different things. And I think, there is no reason for RFC-84 to be a part of RFC-88. Moreover, implementation code of RFC-84 is ready right now, while RFC-88 even as a concept is not fully thought out and well designed yet. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
