the-other-tim-brown commented on code in PR #13213:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/13213#discussion_r2056891775


##########
hudi-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hudi/common/engine/HoodieReaderContext.java:
##########
@@ -285,6 +277,14 @@ public abstract HoodieRecord<T> 
constructHoodieRecord(Option<T> recordOption,
    */
   public abstract T seal(T record);
 
+  /**
+   * Convert engine specific row into binary format.
+   *
+   * @param record The engine row
+   * @return row with binary format
+   */
+  public abstract T toBinaryRow(T record);

Review Comment:
   Instead of enforcing all implementations to have a concept of a Binary 
version, can we move this into the code that reads the data into format `T`? Or 
possible move it to the `seal` functionality?



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to