the-other-tim-brown commented on code in PR #13383:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/13383#discussion_r2128913865


##########
hudi-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hudi/metadata/HoodieTableMetadataUtil.java:
##########
@@ -1701,31 +1677,38 @@ private static 
List<HoodieColumnRangeMetadata<Comparable>> readColumnRangeMetada
    * Read column range metadata from log file.
    */
   @VisibleForTesting
-  public static List<HoodieColumnRangeMetadata<Comparable>> 
getLogFileColumnRangeMetadata(String filePath, HoodieTableMetaClient 
datasetMetaClient,
+  public static List<HoodieColumnRangeMetadata<Comparable>> 
getLogFileColumnRangeMetadata(String filePath, String partitionPath,
+                                                                               
           HoodieTableMetaClient datasetMetaClient,
                                                                                
           List<String> columnsToIndex, Option<Schema> writerSchemaOpt,
                                                                                
           int maxBufferSize) throws IOException {
     if (writerSchemaOpt.isPresent()) {
       List<Pair<String, Schema.Field>> fieldsToIndex = 
columnsToIndex.stream().map(fieldName -> 
HoodieAvroUtils.getSchemaForField(writerSchemaOpt.get(), fieldName))
           .collect(Collectors.toList());
       // read log file records without merging

Review Comment:
   Ok, that is good to know. I am thinking that context may have been missed by 
the original author. Should I update the comment to say something like "read 
log files without merging for lower overhead, log files may contain multiple 
records for the same key resulting in a wider range of values than the merged 
result"?



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to