ericyuan915 commented on PR #19376:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/19376#issuecomment-5114582185

   > > DefaultHoodieSplitProvider.state() persists only pendingSplits, all 
stamped UNASSIGNED — assigned and completed splits aren't in the checkpoint at 
all.
   > 
   > splits that already got assigned will also be checkpointed if it is not 
finished, and each split will remember the position it consumes to, which can 
be used for job recovery where the next run consumes from.
   > 
   > As a user, my understanding is that I can declare the start/end commit for 
the bounded streaming(batch) job, and the job will recover automatically from 
the state to ensure consistency.
   > 
   > I'm assuming the case we want to fix in this patch is not for job auto 
recovery, but a manual restart of the job with an optional flink state, and you 
want to validate the state and the user config consume range is consistent, is 
that right? currenly Flink has no good API to read the state, so there is no 
good way to figure out the consumption offset/progress from the state, what we 
can do is probably validate whether the offset in the state is still in the 
consumption range that user specified?
   
   @danny0405 Hi Danny, yes your understanding is 100% correct. I might 
misunderstand your earlier. But yes, the issue I observed is that when user 
restarts the same job in a different bound range without cleaning up 
checkpoints (previously reading 01/01/2026 but the job fails somehow and has 
checkpoints written, then restarts the job with config of 01/02/2026) the job 
would silently and wrongly resume reading from 01/01/2026. So I'm thinking of 
failing this new run with clear errors, since logging a warning could likely be 
unnoticeable.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to