rangareddy commented on issue #17279: URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/issues/17279#issuecomment-5365812043
This issue was reviewed as part of the JIRA-migrated backlog triage (HUDI-8736). **Findings: still open, but not actionable as written.** The body carries only the JIRA boilerplate. It names four interacting table services - archival, savepoint, restore and cleaning - but states no specific interplay that is wrong, no failure mode, and no target design. There is nothing to verify against the code and nothing a contributor could pick up. Two concrete anchors elsewhere in this backlog could give it scope: - #17266 (HUDI-8733) asks for a soak test across exactly these services under multi-writer concurrency - its failures would name the real interplays. - #17346 (HUDI-8764) covers spill-file cleanup not surviving a JVM kill, which is one concrete instance of lifecycle assumptions not holding. Could whoever owns HUDI-8712 restate this as one or more specific problems - for example "a savepoint does not prevent cleaning of X", or "restore after archival leaves Y inconsistent"? Given it is marked critical, that is worth doing before the next release scope is set. Keeping this open pending scope. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
