hudi-agent commented on code in PR #19678:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/19678#discussion_r3846039554


##########
hudi-utilities/src/test/java/org/apache/hudi/utilities/sources/helpers/unstructured/TestUnstructuredIngestHardening.java:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,194 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+ * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+ * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+ * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ * under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.hudi.utilities.sources.helpers.unstructured;
+
+import org.apache.hudi.common.config.TypedProperties;
+import org.apache.hudi.exception.HoodieException;
+import org.apache.hudi.utilities.config.UnstructuredFileSourceConfig;
+
+import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
+
+import java.io.ByteArrayInputStream;
+import java.io.InputStream;
+import java.nio.charset.StandardCharsets;
+import java.util.List;
+
+import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertEquals;
+import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertThrows;
+import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertTrue;
+
+/**
+ * Regression coverage for the hardening fixes on the unstructured ingest 
path: the bounded
+ * chunk-boundary search preserves output, an Error escapes the Tika parser, 
and the inline
+ * blob threshold is validated. The cost half of the chunker fix is a 
measurement, so it
+ * lives in the scale harness rather than here.
+ */
+public class TestUnstructuredIngestHardening {
+
+  /**
+   * The bounded break search must pick the same break points the unbounded 
one did, so
+   * chunk text, ordering, overlap and char_start offsets are unchanged by the 
fix.
+   */
+  @Test
+  void testBoundedBreakSearchPreservesChunking() {
+    int chunkSize = 64;
+    int overlap = 8;
+    TextChunker chunker = new TextChunker(chunkSize, overlap);
+    String text = "First para line one.\nStill first para.\n\nSecond para 
here! And more? Yes.\n\n"
+        + "Third paragraph with a long unbroken 
runxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx end.";
+
+    List<TextChunker.Chunk> chunks = chunker.chunk(text);
+
+    assertTrue(chunks.size() > 1, "expected the text to split into several 
chunks");
+    for (int i = 0; i < chunks.size(); i++) {
+      TextChunker.Chunk chunk = chunks.get(i);
+      assertEquals(i, chunk.chunkId);
+      assertTrue(chunk.text.length() <= chunkSize, "chunk " + i + " exceeded 
the window");
+      // chunks are verbatim substrings, so char_start must index back into 
the original
+      assertEquals(chunk.text,
+          text.substring(chunk.charStart, chunk.charStart + 
chunk.text.length()));
+      if (i > 0) {
+        TextChunker.Chunk previous = chunks.get(i - 1);
+        assertEquals(previous.charStart + previous.text.length() - overlap, 
chunk.charStart,
+            "chunk " + i + " must start one overlap back from the previous 
chunk's end");
+      }
+    }
+    TextChunker.Chunk last = chunks.get(chunks.size() - 1);
+    assertEquals(text.length(), last.charStart + last.text.length(),
+        "the chunks must cover the whole text");
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Text whose only usable boundary is the space character exercises the miss 
path for
+   * five of the six boundaries on every chunk, which is where the unbounded 
search used to
+   * walk back to index 0. Behaviour must be identical to the general case.
+   */
+  @Test
+  void testChunkingTextWithoutParagraphOrSentenceBoundaries() {
+    TextChunker chunker = new TextChunker(100, 10);
+    StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
+    while (builder.length() < 5000) {
+      builder.append("alpha bravo charlie delta echo foxtrot golf hotel india 
juliet ");
+    }
+    String text = builder.toString();
+
+    List<TextChunker.Chunk> chunks = chunker.chunk(text);
+
+    assertTrue(chunks.size() > 40, "expected many chunks, got " + 
chunks.size());
+    for (TextChunker.Chunk chunk : chunks) {
+      assertEquals(chunk.text,
+          text.substring(chunk.charStart, chunk.charStart + 
chunk.text.length()));
+      assertTrue(chunk.text.length() <= 100);
+    }
+    TextChunker.Chunk last = chunks.get(chunks.size() - 1);
+    assertEquals(text.length(), last.charStart + last.text.length());
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * A corrupt file must not fail the job, but an Error must not be swallowed: 
catching it
+   * would carry on with an undefined JVM state instead of failing the task so 
Spark can
+   * retry it elsewhere. Before the fix the parser caught Throwable and turned 
an
+   * OutOfMemoryError into an ordinary FAILED row.
+   */
+  @Test
+  void testParserPropagatesErrorButRecordsException() {
+    TikaDocumentParser parser = new TikaDocumentParser();
+
+    assertThrows(OutOfMemoryError.class,
+        () -> parser.parse(streamThrowing(new OutOfMemoryError("synthetic 
oom")), "doc.txt", 1000));
+
+    ParseResult result =
+        parser.parse(streamThrowing(new IllegalStateException("synthetic 
failure")), "doc.txt", 1000);
+    assertEquals(ParseResult.ParseStatus.FAILED, result.getStatus());
+    assertTrue(result.getError().contains("synthetic failure"),
+        "the parse error must be recorded on the row, got: " + 
result.getError());
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * readFully narrows the file size to an int, so a threshold above 
Integer.MAX_VALUE has
+   * to be rejected at construction. Before the fix it surfaced as a
+   * NegativeArraySizeException on the first oversized file, deep inside an 
executor.
+   */
+  @Test
+  void testInlineThresholdAboveIntMaxIsRejected() {
+    TypedProperties props = new TypedProperties();
+    props.setProperty(UnstructuredFileSourceConfig.BLOB_INLINE_MAX_BYTES.key(),
+        String.valueOf(Integer.MAX_VALUE + 1L));
+
+    IllegalArgumentException thrown =
+        assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> new 
UnstructuredFileRecordBuilder(props));
+    
assertTrue(thrown.getMessage().contains(UnstructuredFileSourceConfig.BLOB_INLINE_MAX_BYTES.key()),
+        "the error must name the offending config key, got: " + 
thrown.getMessage());
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * The probe is what tells a user their table would have no text at all. 
hudi-utilities has
+   * the Tika parser modules on its test classpath, so here it must report 
that plain text
+   * extracts; a deployment running hudi-utilities-bundle without 
hudi-tika-bundle gets false
+   * and the failure raised by {@link TikaDocumentParser#init}.
+   */
+  @Test
+  void testPlainTextProbeDetectsAvailableParserModules() {
+    assertTrue(TikaDocumentParser.canExtractPlainText(),
+        "tika-parsers-standard-package is on the test classpath, so the probe 
must find text");
+
+    ParseResult parsed = new TikaDocumentParser().parse(
+        new ByteArrayInputStream("hudi lakehouse probe 
text".getBytes(StandardCharsets.UTF_8)),
+        "probe.txt", 1000);
+    assertEquals(ParseResult.ParseStatus.SUCCESS, parsed.getStatus());
+    assertTrue(parsed.getText().contains("lakehouse"));
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * init() runs once per Spark task, so a JVM without parser modules has to 
fail every task.
+   * Memoizing "we already probed" instead of the probe's answer made only the 
first task fail;
+   * Spark's retry of it then short-circuited, succeeded, and left every row 
parse_status=EMPTY.
+   */
+  @Test
+  void testMissingParserModulesFailEveryTaskNotOnlyTheFirst() {
+    Boolean actual = TikaDocumentParser.parserModulesPresent;
+    try {

Review Comment:
   🤖 nit: could you rename `actual` to something like 
`savedParserModulesPresent`? In test code `actual` conventionally names the 
observed result under assertion, so this reads as a save/restore slot only 
after you trace it to the `finally` block.
   
   <sub><i>⚠️ AI-generated; verify before applying. React 👍/👎 to flag 
quality.</i></sub>



##########
pom.xml:
##########
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@
     <module>packaging/hudi-presto-bundle</module>
     <module>packaging/hudi-utilities-bundle</module>
     <module>packaging/hudi-utilities-slim-bundle</module>
+    <module>packaging/hudi-tika-bundle</module>

Review Comment:
   🤖 Since the intended usage is for users to pass `hudi-tika-bundle` alongside 
the utilities bundle via `--jars`, it needs to reach Maven Central at release 
time. I don't see it added to `scripts/release/deploy_staging_jars.sh` (nothing 
depends on it, so `-am` won't pull it in transitively) or to the `bundles` 
array in `scripts/release/validate_staged_bundles.sh`. Could you wire it into 
both so the bundle actually gets staged and validated on release?
   
   <sub><i>⚠️ AI-generated; verify before applying. React 👍/👎 to flag 
quality.</i></sub>



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to