wangxianghu commented on pull request #2963: URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/2963#issuecomment-844945642
> > > Does this have breaking changes for the users? Non-backwards compatible class/package changes? > > > Also can we create a hudi-utilities-common. Not sure if we should move SchemaProvider into hudi-client-common? > > > > > > Yes, it is backwards compatible, and no breaking changes for the users > > Both `HoodieDeltaStreamer` in `hudi-utilities` and `HoodieFlinkStreamer` in `hudi-flink` need `SchemaProvider` to provide schema, so it would be better to be placed in a common module > > We can assume that the `HoodieFlinkStreamer` would be moved into a utility module, as we discussed in other PR before. I considered this, the problem is the rest `hudi-flink` module need `SchemaProvider` too. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
