[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-1904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17375573#comment-17375573
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on HUDI-1904:
--------------------------------------
wangxianghu commented on pull request #2963:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/2963#issuecomment-874518387
Hi, @vinothchandar, any thoughts on the pr?
In this patch, I introduced a `SchemaProviderInterface ` as the base class
of all `SchemaProvider`s and it is engine-free.
it is useful to use `SchemaProvider` with different engines.
currently, spark and flink client both have a `SchemaProvider` class, they
should share a common one.
flink:
`org.apache.hudi.schema.SchemaProvider`
spark:
`org.apache.hudi.utilities.schema.SchemaProvider`
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
> Make SchemaProvider spark free and move it to hudi-client-common
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HUDI-1904
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-1904
> Project: Apache Hudi
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Xianghu Wang
> Assignee: Xianghu Wang
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 0.9.0
>
>
> Currently, we have support spark, flink and java client to operate hudi
> tables. The "common" stuff like `SchemaPriovider` should be extracted and
> move away from `hudi-utilities` module to share with other engines
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
