[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-2101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17386042#comment-17386042
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on HUDI-2101:
--------------------------------------

xiarixiaoyao commented on a change in pull request #3330:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/3330#discussion_r675356988



##########
File path: 
hudi-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hudi/common/model/WriteOperationType.java
##########
@@ -48,6 +48,8 @@
   INSERT_OVERWRITE_TABLE("insert_overwrite_table"),
   // compact
   COMPACT("compact"),
+  // z-order

Review comment:
       @pengzhiwei2018    Due to the implementation of Hudi itself, optimze by 
overwritetable is more convenient to use, since cluster operation need to set 
many properties。   
   Another consideration: as we know delta lake support z-order,  just like 
delta lake api,  we want keep the same implement 




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


> support z-order for hudi
> ------------------------
>
>                 Key: HUDI-2101
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-2101
>             Project: Apache Hudi
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Spark Integration
>            Reporter: tao meng
>            Assignee: tao meng
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 0.10.0
>
>
> support z-order for hudi to optimze the query



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to