[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-2101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17394959#comment-17394959
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on HUDI-2101:
--------------------------------------
satishkotha commented on a change in pull request #3330:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/3330#discussion_r684463076
##########
File path:
hudi-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hudi/common/model/WriteOperationType.java
##########
@@ -48,6 +48,8 @@
INSERT_OVERWRITE_TABLE("insert_overwrite_table"),
// compact
COMPACT("compact"),
+ // z-order
Review comment:
I'm +1 to keep this as a clustering strategy. If needed, we can make top
level API different. But underneath, WriteClient API and ActionExecutor will
benefit from using same code (I do see lot of copy paste code there right now).
Any changes we do in one ActionExecutor will have to be copied to other which
is going to be a challenge.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
> support z-order for hudi
> ------------------------
>
> Key: HUDI-2101
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-2101
> Project: Apache Hudi
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Spark Integration
> Reporter: tao meng
> Assignee: tao meng
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 0.10.0
>
>
> support z-order for hudi to optimze the query
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
