[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-2285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17395104#comment-17395104
]
Prashant Wason commented on HUDI-2285:
--------------------------------------
Current Limitations / Not Implemented:
1. Only Spark Engine related code has been tested. Other engines might be
broken.
2. Rollback has a limitation - Rollbacks do not use the inflight mechanism to
save the rollback plan prior to deleting the files for rollback. This means
that if the files were deleted and commit to metadata table failed, the
rollback will not sync correctly to the metadata table on next try. The fix
would be to improve rollback to use the inflight instant to save a plan (Just
like CLEAN and COMPACTION).
> Metadata Table Synchronous Design
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: HUDI-2285
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-2285
> Project: Apache Hudi
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Prashant Wason
> Assignee: Prashant Wason
> Priority: Major
>
> h2. *Motivation*
> HUDI Metadata Table version 1 (0.7 release) supports file-listing
> optimization. We intend to add support for additional information -
> record-level index(UUID), column indexes (column range index) to the metadata
> table. This requires re-architecting the table design for large scale
> (50billion+ records), synchronous operations and to reduce the reader-side
> overhead.
> # Limit the amount of sync requirement on the reader side
> # Syncing on reader side may negate the benefits of the secondary index
> # Not syncing on the reader-side simplifies design and reduces testing
> # Allow moving to a multi-writer design with operations running in separate
> pipelines
> # E.g. Clustering / Clean / Backfills in separate pipelines
> # Ease of debugging
> # Scale - Should be able to handle very large inserts - millions of keys,
> thousands of datafiles written
>
> h3. *Writer Side*
> The lifecycle of a HUDI operation will be as listed below. The example below
> shows COMMIT operation but the steps apply for all types of operations.
> # SparkHoodieWriteClient.commit(...) is called by ingestion process at time
> T1
> # Create requested instant t1.commit.requested
> # Create inflight instant t1.commit.inflight
> # Perform the write of RDD into the dataset and create the
> HoodieCommitMetadata
> # HoodieMetadataTableWriter.update(CommitMetadata, t1, WriteStatus)
> # This will perform a delta-commit into the HUDI Metadata Table updating the
> file listing, record-level index (future) and column indexes (future)
> together from the data collected in the WriteStatus.
> # This commit will complete before the commit started on the dataset will
> complete.
> # This will create the t1.deltacommit on the Metadata Table.
> # Since Metadata Table has inline clean and inline compaction, those
> additional operations may also take place at this time
> # Complete the commit by creating t1.commit
> Inline-compaction will only compact those log blocks which can be deemed
> readable as per the algorithm described in the reader-side in the next
> section.
> h3. *Reader Side*
> # List the dataset to find all completed instants - e.g. t1.commit,
> t2.commit … t10.commit
> # Since these instants are completed, their related metadata has already
> been written to the metadata table as part of respective deltacommits -
> t1.deltacommit, t2.deltacommit … t10.deltacommit
> # Find the last completed instant on the dataset - t10.commit
> # Open the FileSlice on the metadata partition with the following
> constraints:
> # Any base file with time > t10 cannot be used
> # Any log blocks whose timestamp is not in the list of completed instants
> (#1 above) cannot be used
> # Only in ingestion failure cases the latest base file (created due to
> compaction) or some log blocks may have to be neglected. In success cases,
> this process should not add extra overhead except for listing the dataset.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
