[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-1904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17411626#comment-17411626
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on HUDI-1904:
--------------------------------------
yanghua commented on pull request #2963:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/2963#issuecomment-914824107
> Sorry for the long delay here. this sort of unification makes sense. I ll
track this to completion. I am also thinking of introducing a `HoodieSchema`
abstraction to begin with. let me think this through more.
Hi, @vinothchandar good point for `HoodieSchema`, about this topic, we may
need to think with
[RFC-33](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HUDI/RFC+-+33++Hudi+support+more+comprehensive+Schema+Evolution).
WDYT?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
> Make SchemaProvider spark free and move it to hudi-client-common
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HUDI-1904
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-1904
> Project: Apache Hudi
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Xianghu Wang
> Assignee: Xianghu Wang
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 0.10.0
>
>
> Currently, we have support spark, flink and java client to operate hudi
> tables. The "common" stuff like `SchemaPriovider` should be extracted and
> move away from `hudi-utilities` module to share with other engines
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
