This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

mmodzelewski pushed a commit to branch advertised-addresses
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/iggy.git


The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/advertised-addresses by this 
push:
     new d3932ec49 fix typos
d3932ec49 is described below

commit d3932ec496f715446b3c1bbcb7db83a9bd100407
Author: Maciej Modzelewski <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Wed Aug 5 14:49:08 2026 +0200

    fix typos
---
 core/configs/src/server_ng_config/cluster.rs | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/core/configs/src/server_ng_config/cluster.rs 
b/core/configs/src/server_ng_config/cluster.rs
index 60a2a2d50..9a6b38fc6 100644
--- a/core/configs/src/server_ng_config/cluster.rs
+++ b/core/configs/src/server_ng_config/cluster.rs
@@ -1238,7 +1238,7 @@ struct EffectiveClients {
     ranges: Vec<ClientAddressRange>,
     /// The catch-all also wins clients whose peer address the transport
     /// could not produce ([`ResolvedClusterNode::advertised_for`] with no
-    /// client IP), so two catch-alls overlap even when selectors cover both
+    /// client IP), so two catch-all overlap even when selectors cover both
     /// address families.
     serves_unknown_peers: bool,
 }
@@ -2419,7 +2419,7 @@ mod cluster_validate_tests {
     #[test]
     fn validate_rejects_duplicate_catch_all_even_when_fully_shadowed() {
         // A client whose peer address the transport cannot produce always
-        // falls to the catch-all, so duplicate catch-alls conflict even when
+        // falls to the catch-all, so duplicate catch-all conflict even when
         // selectors cover every known network.
         let mut n1 = node("n1", 0);
         n1.ip = "10.0.0.1".to_owned();

Reply via email to