ryerraguntla commented on code in PR #4043: URL: https://github.com/apache/iggy/pull/4043#discussion_r3967505414
########## gateways/kafka/src/bridge/error.rs: ########## @@ -0,0 +1,185 @@ +// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one +// or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file +// distributed with this work for additional information +// regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file +// to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the +// "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance +// with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at +// +// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 +// +// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, +// software distributed under the License is distributed on an +// "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY +// KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the +// specific language governing permissions and limitations +// under the License. + +use iggy::prelude::IggyError; +use thiserror::Error; + +use crate::protocol::api::{ + ERROR_INVALID_PARTITIONS, ERROR_NOT_LEADER_OR_FOLLOWER, ERROR_TOPIC_AUTHORIZATION_FAILED, + ERROR_UNKNOWN_SERVER_ERROR, ERROR_UNKNOWN_TOPIC_OR_PARTITION, +}; + +/// Errors from the `IggyBridge`: connection lifecycle, config, and Iggy SDK calls. +#[derive(Debug, Error)] +pub enum BridgeError { + /// Bridge config is structurally invalid (empty address, missing credentials, malformed + /// topic-mapping TOML) - caught before any connection attempt. + #[error("invalid bridge configuration: {0}")] + InvalidConfig(String), + /// The Iggy client could not connect or authenticate, or a call failed after connecting. + /// Wraps the SDK's own error rather than re-deriving a parallel taxonomy. + #[error("Iggy client error: {0}")] + Iggy(#[from] IggyError), + /// `high_watermark` was asked about a partition index the topic doesn't have. + #[error( + "partition {partition} out of range for topic '{topic}' ({partitions_count} partitions)" + )] + PartitionOutOfRange { + topic: String, + partition: u32, + partitions_count: u32, + }, + /// `ensure_topic` was asked to ensure a topic that already exists with a different partition + /// count. `ensure_topic`'s whole contract is "the topic has `partition_count` partitions + /// afterward" - silently keeping the old count and returning `Ok(())` would let two + /// concurrent callers requesting different counts for the same topic both believe they + /// succeeded. + #[error( + "topic '{topic}' already exists with {existing} partitions, but {requested} were requested" + )] + PartitionCountMismatch { + topic: String, + existing: u32, + requested: u32, + }, +} + +impl BridgeError { + /// Maps this error to the Kafka protocol error code a handler should answer with. + /// + /// Connection-shaped failures reuse `NOT_LEADER_OR_FOLLOWER` (6) - the same retriable code + /// the foundation's Produce/Fetch stubs already send - so a client backs off and retries + /// rather than treating a transient Iggy outage as a permanent failure. Not-found maps to + /// `UNKNOWN_TOPIC_OR_PARTITION` (3). Anything without a closer analogue falls back to + /// `UNKNOWN_SERVER_ERROR` (-1). + #[must_use] + pub const fn to_kafka_error_code(&self) -> i16 { + match self { + Self::Iggy(err) => iggy_error_to_kafka_code(err), + Self::PartitionOutOfRange { .. } => ERROR_UNKNOWN_TOPIC_OR_PARTITION, + Self::PartitionCountMismatch { .. } => ERROR_INVALID_PARTITIONS, Review Comment: Kafka’s text for 37 is “number of partitions is below 1”, which is not this case. Will map `PartitionCountMismatch` to `TOPIC_ALREADY_EXISTS` (36) and add `ERROR_TOPIC_ALREADY_EXISTS` in `protocol/api.rs`. Still not a perfect Kafka analogue (the topic exists, but with a *different* count); 36 is the closest code that does not lie about “< 1 partitions”. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
