ryerraguntla commented on code in PR #4043:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iggy/pull/4043#discussion_r4001368547


##########
gateways/kafka/src/bridge/iggy_bridge.rs:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,381 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+// distributed with this work for additional information
+// regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+// to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+// "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+// with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+//
+//   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+//
+// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+// software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+// "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+// KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+// specific language governing permissions and limitations
+// under the License.
+
+use std::time::Duration;
+
+use iggy::prelude::{
+    AutoLogin, Client, Credentials, Identifier, IggyClient, IggyClientBuilder, 
IggyError,
+    StreamClient, TopicClient, TopicCreateOptions,
+};
+use tracing::{debug, info};
+
+use crate::bridge::config::IggyBridgeConfig;
+use crate::bridge::error::BridgeError;
+
+/// Passes attempted, after the first, before [`IggyBridge::connect`] gives up 
and returns `Err`.
+///
+/// Not the SDK's own default (`TcpClientReconnectionConfig::default()` is 
`max_retries: None` -
+/// unlimited, one dial per second, forever). A Kafka client already retries 
at the wire-protocol
+/// level once a handler maps a bridge failure to a retriable error code; the 
bridge blocking a
+/// request task inside an unbounded internal reconnect loop would just add a 
second, invisible
+/// retry layer underneath that one instead of surfacing the failure so the 
mapped code can be
+/// sent.
+///
+/// This bounds the *count*, not the *wall-clock time*, of that inner retry 
loop - see
+/// [`CONNECT_TIMEOUT`] for the latter.
+const RECONNECTION_RETRIES: u32 = 3;
+
+/// Wall-clock ceiling on the whole `client.connect()` call in 
[`IggyBridge::connect`], including
+/// every attempt [`RECONNECTION_RETRIES`] makes internally.
+///
+/// Without this, an unreachable-but-not-refusing address hangs far longer 
than "a few seconds":
+/// `TcpClient::establish_bounded` only applies its own 
`FAILOVER_DIAL_TIMEOUT` (2s) when at least
+/// two failover candidates are configured (`tcp_client.rs`) - a bridge always 
configures exactly
+/// one address, so that guard never engages, and the plain 
`TcpStream::connect` underneath has no
+/// deadline of its own. Against a firewall that drops SYN packets instead of 
refusing them, each
+/// of the up to `RECONNECTION_RETRIES + 1` dial attempts pays the kernel's 
own SYN-retry timeout
+/// (minutes, not seconds) rather than the `reconnection_interval` between 
attempts - a closed port
+/// (instant RST) never exercises this path, so the failure mode only shows up 
in production.
+/// 15s comfortably covers a slow-but-alive server's handshake (well above p99 
login latency) while
+/// still failing well short of the pathological multi-minute case.
+const CONNECT_TIMEOUT: Duration = Duration::from_secs(15);
+
+/// Owns one connected `IggyClient` and resolves Kafka topics against it.
+///
+/// Produce/Fetch handler wiring is a separate, later change (`#3535`/`#3536`) 
- this type is the
+/// shared plumbing those handlers will call into, exercised standalone here 
via its own tests and
+/// an integration test against a real `iggy-server`.
+pub struct IggyBridge {
+    client: IggyClient,
+    config: IggyBridgeConfig,
+}
+
+impl IggyBridge {
+    /// Connects to Iggy using `config` and authenticates.
+    ///
+    /// Builds the client through the SDK's fluent TCP builder rather than 
hand-assembling an
+    /// `iggy://user:pass@host` connection string: that string format splits 
on `@` then `:`, so a
+    /// password containing either character (`p@ss:word`) would be misparsed 
into a garbled
+    /// address instead of failing with a diagnosable config error. The fluent 
builder passes
+    /// `username`/`password` as already-separated fields, sidestepping the 
ambiguity entirely.
+    ///
+    /// # Errors
+    ///
+    /// Returns [`BridgeError::InvalidConfig`] if `config.address` is empty. 
Returns
+    /// [`BridgeError::Iggy`] if the address is malformed, the TCP connection 
fails, connecting
+    /// takes longer than `CONNECT_TIMEOUT` (an 
unreachable-and-silently-dropping address, not
+    /// just a refused one, is covered - see that constant's doc), or 
authentication is rejected -
+    /// this is the boundary [`BridgeError::to_kafka_error_code`] exists for: 
a handler calling
+    /// this must map the error to a wire response, never panic or unwrap, 
since an unreachable
+    /// Iggy backend is an expected runtime condition, not a bug.
+    pub async fn connect(config: IggyBridgeConfig) -> Result<Self, 
BridgeError> {
+        if config.address.trim().is_empty() {
+            return Err(BridgeError::InvalidConfig(
+                "Iggy address must not be empty".to_string(),
+            ));
+        }
+
+        let credentials =
+            Credentials::UsernamePassword(config.username.clone(), 
config.password.clone());
+        let client = IggyClientBuilder::new()
+            .with_tcp()
+            .with_server_address(config.address.clone())
+            .with_auto_sign_in(AutoLogin::Enabled(credentials))
+            .with_reconnection_max_retries(Some(RECONNECTION_RETRIES))
+            .build()
+            .map_err(BridgeError::Iggy)?;
+        tokio::time::timeout(CONNECT_TIMEOUT, client.connect())
+            .await
+            .map_err(|_elapsed| 
BridgeError::Iggy(IggyError::CannotEstablishConnection))?
+            .map_err(BridgeError::Iggy)?;
+        info!("Iggy bridge connected to {}", config.address);
+
+        Ok(Self { client, config })
+    }
+
+    /// Tears down the underlying Iggy client, including its background 
heartbeat task.
+    ///
+    /// Not `IggyClient::disconnect`: that only tears down the transport
+    /// (`TcpClient::disconnect_transport`) and never touches 
`heartbeat_handle` - only
+    /// `IggyClient`'s own `Drop` aborts that task (`client.rs`). A 
`disconnect`ed-but-not-dropped
+    /// bridge would keep heartbeating on a schedule, hit `NotConnected` 
(itself in the SDK's
+    /// retriable set), and reconnect plus re-authenticate using the 
credentials `connect`
+    /// configured, so the "closed" client silently comes back. `shutdown` sets
+    /// `ClientState::Shutdown`, which the heartbeat loop's next `ping` 
observes as
+    /// `IggyError::ClientShutdown` and self-terminates on, and which 
`sign_in_credentials` never
+    /// dials past.
+    ///
+    /// Takes `self` by value: `shutdown` is terminal (no reconnect is coming 
back from it), so
+    /// nothing legitimate is left to call on this bridge afterward. This does 
mean a bridge shared
+    /// via `Arc` cannot call this directly (`Arc::try_unwrap` first) - not a 
concern before
+    /// `#3535`/`#3536` wire an owning caller in.
+    ///
+    /// # Errors
+    ///
+    /// Returns [`BridgeError::Iggy`] if the underlying client reports a 
shutdown failure (e.g. the
+    /// socket was already in a state that rejects a clean shutdown).
+    pub async fn close(self) -> Result<(), BridgeError> {
+        self.client.shutdown().await.map_err(BridgeError::Iggy)
+    }
+
+    /// Ensures the Iggy stream and topic backing `kafka_topic` exist, 
creating either or both if
+    /// missing. Resolves `kafka_topic` through the configured 
[`TopicMapping`](crate::bridge::topic_map::TopicMapping).
+    ///
+    /// Idempotent when repeated with the *same* `partition_count`: a `get` 
before each `create`
+    /// means calling this twice for the same topic is a no-op the second 
time, and a
+    /// `NameAlreadyExists` race from a concurrent caller creating the same 
stream/topic between
+    /// this call's `get` and `create` is treated as success, not an error - 
the desired end state
+    /// (it exists) is what idempotency actually promises, not that this call 
was the one that
+    /// created it. A *different* `partition_count` against an 
already-existing topic is not
+    /// idempotent - see [`BridgeError::PartitionCountMismatch`].
+    ///
+    /// # Errors
+    ///
+    /// Returns [`BridgeError::Iggy`] for connectivity/auth/invalid-name 
failures. Returns
+    /// [`BridgeError::PartitionCountMismatch`] if the topic already exists 
with a different
+    /// partition count than `partition_count`.
+    pub async fn ensure_stream_and_topic(
+        &self,
+        kafka_topic: &str,
+        partition_count: u32,
+    ) -> Result<(), BridgeError> {
+        let (stream_name, topic_name) = 
self.config.topic_mapping.resolve(kafka_topic);
+        let stream_id = self.ensure_stream(&stream_name).await?;
+        self.ensure_topic(&stream_id, &topic_name, kafka_topic, 
partition_count)
+            .await?;
+        Ok(())
+    }
+
+    /// Ensures the stream named `stream_name` exists, creating it if missing.
+    ///
+    /// `Identifier::named` - never `Identifier::try_from`/`FromStr` - because 
the latter parses
+    /// an all-digit string as a numeric Iggy ID rather than a name. A stream 
or topic named e.g.
+    /// `"42"` would otherwise resolve against the wrong resource on every 
call after the first:
+    /// the first `ensure_stream_and_topic("42", ...)` creates a stream 
*named* `"42"`, but a
+    /// second call would look it up *by ID* `42` instead, almost certainly 
finding nothing and
+    /// breaking the "idempotent on repeated calls" guarantee.
+    ///
+    /// Returns the same *named* `Identifier` it was given, not the numeric id 
the SDK hands back
+    /// from `get`/`create` - streams are backed by a recycled slab 
(`core/metadata`'s
+    /// `stm/stream.rs`: freed keys are reused by the next created stream), so 
a numeric id
+    /// captured here could point at a *different* stream by the time 
`ensure_topic` uses it, if
+    /// this stream is deleted and recreated in between. The name has no such 
window.
+    async fn ensure_stream(&self, stream_name: &str) -> Result<Identifier, 
BridgeError> {
+        let identifier = 
Identifier::named(stream_name).map_err(BridgeError::Iggy)?;
+        if let Some(_existing) = self
+            .client
+            .get_stream(&identifier)
+            .await
+            .map_err(BridgeError::Iggy)?
+        {
+            debug!("Iggy stream '{stream_name}' already exists");
+            return Ok(identifier);
+        }
+
+        match self.client.create_stream(stream_name).await {
+            Ok(_created) => {
+                info!("created Iggy stream '{stream_name}'");
+                Ok(identifier)
+            }
+            Err(IggyError::StreamNameAlreadyExists(_)) => {
+                // Lost a create race - the name now exists regardless of who 
won it.
+                Ok(identifier)
+            }
+            Err(err) => Err(BridgeError::Iggy(err)),
+        }
+    }
+
+    /// Looks up (or creates) the topic named `topic_name` under `stream_id`.
+    ///
+    /// `Identifier::named`, not `Identifier::try_from` - see 
[`Self::ensure_stream`]'s doc
+    /// comment; the same numeric-name ambiguity applies to topic names.
+    async fn ensure_topic(
+        &self,
+        stream_id: &Identifier,
+        topic_name: &str,
+        kafka_topic: &str,
+        partition_count: u32,
+    ) -> Result<(), BridgeError> {
+        let identifier = 
Identifier::named(topic_name).map_err(BridgeError::Iggy)?;
+        if let Some(existing) = self
+            .client
+            .get_topic(stream_id, &identifier)
+            .await
+            .map_err(BridgeError::Iggy)?
+        {
+            debug!("Iggy topic '{topic_name}' already exists");
+            // ensure_topic's contract is "the topic has partition_count 
partitions afterward" -
+            // a mismatch here means that's false. Returning Ok(()) anyway 
(even with a warn!)
+            // would let two concurrent callers requesting different counts 
for the same topic
+            // both believe they succeeded; growing partitions on the caller's 
behalf is also a
+            // bigger decision (CreatePartitions has its own semantics) than 
this method should
+            // make silently. Erring is the only response that keeps the 
postcondition honest.
+            if existing.partitions_count != partition_count {
+                return Err(BridgeError::PartitionCountMismatch {
+                    // The Kafka-side name a caller actually asked about, not 
`topic_name` - see
+                    // the identical note on `PartitionOutOfRange` in 
`high_watermark`.
+                    topic: kafka_topic.to_string(),
+                    existing: existing.partitions_count,
+                    requested: partition_count,
+                });
+            }
+            return Ok(());
+        }
+
+        // message_expiry left at TopicCreateOptions::default() (None -> 
ServerDefault) means
+        // never-expire (segment_cleaner.rs treats ServerDefault the same as 
NeverExpire), not
+        // Kafka's own 7-day default - deliberate for now (imposing a 
retention policy is a product
+        // decision this bridge shouldn't make unasked), but a real surprise 
for anyone repointing
+        // a Kafka app that assumes bounded retention. Flagged in the README; 
revisit once there's
+        // a way to configure it (env var, topic-mapping field) rather than 
hardcoding a number.
+        let options = TopicCreateOptions {
+            partitions_count: Some(partition_count),
+            ..TopicCreateOptions::default()
+        };
+        match self
+            .client
+            .create_topic(stream_id, topic_name, &options)
+            .await
+        {
+            Ok(created) => {
+                info!("created Iggy topic '{topic_name}' with 
{partition_count} partitions");
+                // Cheap: TopicDetails is already in hand, no extra round 
trip. `partitions_count`
+                // is a hard argument to create_topic (Some(partition_count), 
never None), so the
+                // server has no "resolve at admission" substitution to fall 
back on here - but
+                // checking anyway, the same way the other two branches check 
their own
+                // postcondition, means a future server-side clamp/cap fails 
loudly here instead
+                // of this method silently reporting success under a broken 
contract.
+                if created.partitions_count != partition_count {
+                    return Err(BridgeError::PartitionCountMismatch {
+                        topic: kafka_topic.to_string(),
+                        existing: created.partitions_count,
+                        requested: partition_count,
+                    });
+                }
+                Ok(())
+            }
+            Err(IggyError::TopicNameAlreadyExists(_, _)) => {
+                // Lost a create race - re-verify by name rather than trusting 
the race outcome
+                // alone, the same way ensure_stream's arm does. The winner of 
the race may have
+                // created it with a different partition count than this call 
requested, so this
+                // needs the same mismatch check the existing-topic branch 
above makes - skipping
+                // it here would let two concurrent ensure_topic(N) / 
ensure_topic(M) calls for
+                // the same topic both return Ok(()).
+                let existing = self
+                    .client
+                    .get_topic(stream_id, &identifier)
+                    .await
+                    .map_err(BridgeError::Iggy)?
+                    .ok_or_else(|| {
+                        IggyError::TopicNameNotFound(topic_name.to_string(), 
stream_id.to_string())
+                    })?;
+                if existing.partitions_count != partition_count {
+                    return Err(BridgeError::PartitionCountMismatch {
+                        topic: kafka_topic.to_string(),
+                        existing: existing.partitions_count,
+                        requested: partition_count,
+                    });
+                }
+                Ok(())
+            }
+            Err(err) => Err(BridgeError::Iggy(err)),
+        }
+    }
+
+    /// Returns the high watermark (offset the next produced message would 
receive) for one
+    /// partition of the Iggy topic `kafka_topic` maps to.
+    ///
+    /// Takes `kafka_topic`, not raw Iggy stream/topic names, and resolves it 
through the same
+    /// [`TopicMapping`](crate::bridge::topic_map::TopicMapping) 
`ensure_stream_and_topic`
+    /// uses - a caller (a future `ListOffsets` handler ) only ever has the 
Kafka-side
+    /// name, and a topic with a mapping override would silently query the 
wrong Iggy resource
+    /// if this took Iggy-space names directly instead.
+    ///
+    /// `Partition::current_offset` is the offset of the *last written* 
message, not "next offset
+    /// to produce" - confirmed against a live server (3 produced messages 
read back
+    /// `current_offset == 2`). An empty partition has no last-written offset 
at all, so this
+    /// needs a dedicated empty case rather than inferring it from 
`current_offset == 0` (also a
+    /// fresh partition's default value, indistinguishable from "one message 
at offset 0").
+    ///
+    /// That empty case is `messages_count == 0 && current_offset == 0`, not 
`messages_count == 0`
+    /// alone: retention cleanup decrements `messages_count`
+    /// (`iggy_partition.rs::decrement_messages_count`) without rewinding 
`current_offset`, so a
+    /// fully-purged but previously-produced-to partition would otherwise read 
as empty.
+    ///
+    /// Known remaining gap, not fixable client-side: `(0, 0)` is also what a 
stats-registry MISS
+    /// reports (`responses.rs`'s `PartitionResponse` builder), 
indistinguishable on the wire from
+    /// a genuinely empty partition. Narrow and self-healing - 
`partition_reconciler.rs`'s
+    /// `settle_partition_stats` opens this only on the teardown-for-rebuild 
path, closing once the
+    /// rebuild completes; deletes never open it. The real answer 
(`Partition::offset_frontier`)
+    /// stays server-side and isn't in this response. The check matches the 
server's own
+    /// `PartitionState::store_offset_range_error` condition, so it's not an 
invented heuristic - a
+    /// future `ListOffsets` (`#3537`) built on this inherits the same blind 
spot.
+    ///
+    /// # Errors
+    ///
+    /// Returns [`BridgeError::Iggy`] if the mapped stream/topic doesn't 
exist. Returns
+    /// [`BridgeError::PartitionOutOfRange`] if `partition` is beyond the 
topic's partition count.
+    pub async fn high_watermark(

Review Comment:
   **Fixed**. Added high_watermarks(kafka_topic, partitions: &[u32]) - one 
get_topic call regardless of partition count, using binary_search_by_key per 
requested partition. high_watermark now delegates to it for a single partition. 
New test: high_watermarks_reports_every_requested_partition_from_one_round_trip 
(3-partition topic, distinct counts per partition, one call, order preserved).



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to