Author: buildbot
Date: Wed Jul 30 12:53:19 2014
New Revision: 917944

Log:
Staging update by buildbot for jena

Modified:
    websites/staging/jena/trunk/content/   (props changed)
    websites/staging/jena/trunk/content/documentation/inference/index.html

Propchange: websites/staging/jena/trunk/content/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- cms:source-revision (original)
+++ cms:source-revision Wed Jul 30 12:53:19 2014
@@ -1 +1 @@
-1614639
+1614641

Modified: websites/staging/jena/trunk/content/documentation/inference/index.html
==============================================================================
--- websites/staging/jena/trunk/content/documentation/inference/index.html 
(original)
+++ websites/staging/jena/trunk/content/documentation/inference/index.html Wed 
Jul 30 12:53:19 2014
@@ -155,8 +155,9 @@
   of the API. </p>
 
 <p> Note that this is a preliminary version of this document, some errors or 
inconsistencies
-  are possible, and feedback to the author (via the <a 
href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jena-dev";>jena-dev</a>
-  support list) is welcomed. </p>
+  are possible, feedback to the 
+  <a href="http://jena.apache.org/help_and_support/index.html";>mailing 
lists</a>
+  is welcomed. </p>
 
 <h2 id="index">Index</h2>
 <p><ol>
@@ -2249,10 +2250,8 @@ while (i.hasNext()) {
   example of how this extension can be done.</p>
 <p>[<a href="#index">Index</a>]</p></p>
 <h2 id="wzxhzdk2110wzxhzdk2111futures"><a name="futures"></a>Futures</h2>
-<p><p>Whilst we can make no firm commitments, at the time of writing we intend 
to
-  continue work on the Jena reasoning support. The key activities on the 
drawing
-  board are:</p>
-<ul>
+<p><p>Contributions for the following areas would be very welcome:</p>
+c<ul>
   <li>Develop a custom equality reasoner which can handle the 
&quot;owl:sameAs&quot;
     and related processing more efficiently that the plain rules engine.</li>
   <li>Tune the RETE engine to perform better with highly non-ground 
patterns.</li>


Reply via email to