gabriel-farache commented on code in PR #4094:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-runtimes/pull/4094#discussion_r2588610278
##########
jbpm/jbpm-flow/src/main/java/org/kie/kogito/process/impl/AbstractProcessInstance.java:
##########
@@ -225,9 +226,35 @@ protected void reconnect() {
}
getProcessRuntime().getProcessInstanceManager().setLock(((MutableProcessInstances<T>)
process.instances()).lock());
processInstance.setMetaData(KOGITO_PROCESS_INSTANCE, this);
+
+ restoreProcessInstanceContext();
+
processInstance.reconnect();
}
+ private void restoreProcessInstanceContext() {
+ Map<String, List<String>> headers = processInstance.getHeaders();
+ if (headers != null && !headers.isEmpty()) {
+ Map<String, String> contextMap =
convertHeadersToContextMap(headers);
+ if (!contextMap.isEmpty()) {
+
org.kie.kogito.services.context.ProcessInstanceContext.setContextFromAsync(contextMap);
Review Comment:
Ah! yes, you are right; I was too focused on inter-thread interaction that
it slipped my mind that even within the same thread, this could be called by
another part of the code which will result in context loss
Let me add
```
Map<String, String> currentMdc = MDC.getCopyOfContextMap();
if (currentMdc != null) {
contextMap.putAll(currentMdc); // Preserve existing
}
```
in the top of `setContextFromAsync` to save the MDC already present
This will preserve the core keys and extends the extensions related keys
Does it make sense?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
