LOG4J2-1297 small syntax edits
Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/logging-log4j2/repo Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/logging-log4j2/commit/26d87c37 Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/logging-log4j2/tree/26d87c37 Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/logging-log4j2/diff/26d87c37 Branch: refs/heads/LOG4j2-494 Commit: 26d87c37236ff200d57e18d5bebb41491fa945c8 Parents: 7730ae5 Author: rpopma <[email protected]> Authored: Mon Apr 25 23:49:21 2016 +0900 Committer: Ralph Goers <[email protected]> Committed: Mon Apr 25 21:30:30 2016 -0700 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- src/site/xdoc/manual/garbagefree.xml | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/logging-log4j2/blob/26d87c37/src/site/xdoc/manual/garbagefree.xml ---------------------------------------------------------------------- diff --git a/src/site/xdoc/manual/garbagefree.xml b/src/site/xdoc/manual/garbagefree.xml index c9e8692..6222a45 100644 --- a/src/site/xdoc/manual/garbagefree.xml +++ b/src/site/xdoc/manual/garbagefree.xml @@ -359,8 +359,8 @@ public void garbageFree() { <a name="Throughput" /> <h4>Throughput of Garbage-free Logging May Be Worse (But It's All Relative)</h4> - <p>Log4j 2.6 in garbage-free mode has the highest throughput in single-threaded scenarios. In multi-threaded - scenarios, Log4j 2.6 "classic" has highest throughput, with Log4j 2.6 in garbage-free mode and Log4j 2.5 + <p>In our measurements, Log4j 2.6 in garbage-free mode had the highest throughput in single-threaded scenarios. In multi-threaded + scenarios, Log4j 2.6 "classic" had the highest throughput, with Log4j 2.6 in garbage-free mode and Log4j 2.5 not far behind. Our test results suggest that the throughput of all other logging frameworks rapidly declines in multi-threaded applications.</p> <p>The graph below compares Log4j 2.6 in garbage-free mode to Log4j 2.6 "classic" mode (which allocates @@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ public void garbageFree() { Log4j 1.2.17, Logback and JUL use their respective File appenders. ImmediateFlush was set to <tt>false</tt> for all loggers that support this. The JUL results are for the <tt>XMLFormatter</tt> (which in our measurements was about twice as fast as the <tt>SimpleFormatter</tt>).</p> - <p>The synchronous logging throughput results below are generated with the + <p>The synchronous logging throughput results below are obtained with the <a href="http://openjdk.java.net/projects/code-tools/jmh/";>JMH</a> Java benchmark harness. See the <tt>org.apache.logging.log4j.perf.jmh.FileAppenderBenchmark</tt> source code in the log4j-perf module.</p> <p><img src="../images/garbage-free2.6-SyncThroughputLinux.png"
