Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Marmotta Wiki" for change notification.
The "LDPImplementationReport/2014-09-16" page has been changed by SergioFernandez: https://wiki.apache.org/marmotta/LDPImplementationReport/2014-09-16 Comment: added new ldp implementation report New page: = LDP Implementation Report (2014-09-16) = (implementation report based on the [[http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-ldp-20140916/|20140916, Last Call Working Draft]]). * '''Identifiers''' * trailing slash is ignored (removed) for URI generation. thus http://example.com/foo and http://example.com/foo/ are treated as identic. * query part of an URL will never be used as part of a URI. query parameters might be used for some LDP operations such as non-membership triples (tbd) * resources with fragments can't be addressed directly, but can be accessed via their container (URL without fragment) * '''Storage''' * internally every LDPR will be stored in its own (Sesame) context (as could be interpreted from [[https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp.html#h5_ldpc-post-createrdf|sec 5.2.3.4]]) * that would allow us to extend the Resource concept beyond the common understanding in triplestores (just one level of outgoing triples) * '''Paging''' and '''Sorting''' is not supported Anyway the WG has resolved (Feb 17, 2014) to move out paging and ordering into a separate spec: [[http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2014-02-17#resolution_5|2014-02-17#r5]] * '''ETags''' for LDP-RS are ''weak'' and soley based on the {{{dcterms:modified}}} value, while ETags for LDP-NR are based on the md5sum of the file content. * Both '''LDP-NR''' and '''LDP-NR''' are supported * Our interpretation of Sec. 5.2.3.12 implements that POST of content types not managed by the platform (i.e., not suitable Rio parser registered) adds a LDP-RS as member of the container, linking ({{{dct:hasFormat}}}/{{{dct:isFormatOf}}}) to the actual LDP-NR (URI is build by appending the file extension according the content type) * '''Only LDP-BC''' is supported, since current use cases do not justify the inclusion of LDP-DC or LDP-IC * Sec. 5.2.3.12 ('''{{{rel='describedby'}}}-Link''') will be fulfilled by pointing to this page. {{{Link: <http://wiki.apache.org/marmotta/LDPImplementationReport/2014-09-16>; rel="describedby"}}} * '''PATCH''' accepts [[http://afs.github.io/rdf-patch/|application/rdf-patch]] only (LD Patch support will be discussed) Patches with the predicate {{{ldp:contains}}} will result in a {{{HTTP 409 Conflict}}}
