This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

elharo pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/maven-site.git


The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
     new d9e08e2  docs: remove forward looking statement (#245)
d9e08e2 is described below

commit d9e08e2c24e31f17b60b19296231110cc096704d
Author: Elliotte Rusty Harold <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Thu Jul 1 11:51:56 2021 +0000

    docs: remove forward looking statement (#245)
    
    @khmarbaise
---
 content/apt/pom.apt | 9 +++------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/content/apt/pom.apt b/content/apt/pom.apt
index 858ea56..fa6b5ab 100644
--- a/content/apt/pom.apt
+++ b/content/apt/pom.apt
@@ -1483,14 +1483,11 @@ Display parameters as parsed by Maven (in canonical 
form) and comparison result:
 +-------------------------+
 
   Licenses are legal documents defining how and when a project (or parts of a 
project) may be used.
-  Note that a project should list only licenses that may apply directly to 
this project, and not list
-  licenses that apply to this project's dependencies. Maven currently does 
little with these documents
-  other than displays them on generated sites. However, there is talk of 
flexing for different types
-  of licenses, forcing users to accept license agreements for certain types of 
(non open source)
-  projects.
+  A project should list licenses that apply directly to this project, and not 
list
+  licenses that apply to the project's dependencies.
 
   * <<name>>, <<url>> and <<comments>>:
-  are self explanatory, and have been encountered before in other capacities.
+  are self explanatory, and have been encountered before in other contexts.
   Using an {{{https://spdx.org/licenses/}SPDX identifier}} as the license 
<<name>> is recommended.
   The fourth license element is:
 

Reply via email to