This email list is read-only.  Emails sent to this list will be discarded
----------------------------------
 doc/rfc2131.txt | 2523 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 doc/rfc2132.txt | 1907 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 4430 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

New commits:
commit b1ab32ee607c47dec613be7f5a10bb82d2941f3f
Author: Marcel Holtmann <[email protected]>
Date:   Mon Dec 22 08:55:37 2008 +0100

    Add copy of RFC 2132 (DHCP options)

commit ba68ec516ff25953c798a4dccd1d7867a9419a92
Author: Marcel Holtmann <[email protected]>
Date:   Mon Dec 22 08:53:57 2008 +0100

    Add copy of RFC 2131 (DHCP system)


Diff in this email is a maximum of 400 lines.
diff --git a/doc/rfc2131.txt b/doc/rfc2131.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f45d9b8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/rfc2131.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,2523 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Network Working Group                                           R. Droms
+Request for Comments: 2131                           Bucknell University
+Obsoletes: 1541                                               March 1997
+Category: Standards Track
+
+                  Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol
+
+Status of this memo
+
+   This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
+   Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
+   improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
+   Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
+   and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
+
+Abstract
+
+   The Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) provides a framework
+   for passing configuration information to hosts on a TCPIP network.
+   DHCP is based on the Bootstrap Protocol (BOOTP) [7], adding the
+   capability of automatic allocation of reusable network addresses and
+   additional configuration options [19].  DHCP captures the behavior of
+   BOOTP relay agents [7, 21], and DHCP participants can interoperate
+   with BOOTP participants [9].
+
+Table of Contents
+
+   1.  Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  2
+   1.1 Changes to RFC1541. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
+   1.2 Related Work. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
+   1.3 Problem definition and issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
+   1.4 Requirements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
+   1.5 Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
+   1.6 Design goals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
+   2.  Protocol Summary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
+   2.1 Configuration parameters repository . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
+   2.2 Dynamic allocation of network addresses . . . . . . . . . . . 12
+   3.  The Client-Server Protocol. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
+   3.1 Client-server interaction - allocating a network address. . . 13
+   3.2 Client-server interaction - reusing a  previously allocated
+       network address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
+   3.3 Interpretation and representation of time values. . . . . . . 20
+   3.4 Obtaining parameters with externally configured network
+       address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
+   3.5 Client parameters in DHCP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
+   3.6 Use of DHCP in clients with multiple interfaces . . . . . . . 22
+   3.7 When clients should use DHCP. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
+   4.  Specification of the DHCP client-server protocol. . . . . . . 22
+
+
+
+Droms                       Standards Track                     [Page 1]
+
+RFC 2131          Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol         March 1997
+
+
+   4.1 Constructing and sending DHCP messages. . . . . . . . . . . . 22
+   4.2 DHCP server administrative controls . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
+   4.3 DHCP server behavior. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
+   4.4 DHCP client behavior. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
+   5.  Acknowledgments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .42
+   6.  References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .42
+   7.  Security Considerations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .43
+   8.  Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .44
+   A.  Host Configuration Parameters  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .45
+List of Figures
+   1. Format of a DHCP message . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
+   2. Format of the 'flags' field. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
+   3. Timeline diagram of messages exchanged between DHCP client and
+      servers when allocating a new network address. . . . . . . . . 15
+   4. Timeline diagram of messages exchanged between DHCP client and
+      servers when reusing a previously allocated network address. . 18
+   5. State-transition diagram for DHCP clients. . . . . . . . . . . 34
+List of Tables
+   1. Description of fields in a DHCP message. . . . . . . . . . . . 10
+   2. DHCP messages. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
+   3. Fields and options used by DHCP servers. . . . . . . . . . . . 28
+   4. Client messages from various states. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
+   5. Fields and options used by DHCP clients. . . . . . . . . . . . 37
+
+1. Introduction
+
+   The Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) provides configuration
+   parameters to Internet hosts.  DHCP consists of two components: a
+   protocol for delivering host-specific configuration parameters from a
+   DHCP server to a host and a mechanism for allocation of network
+   addresses to hosts.
+
+   DHCP is built on a client-server model, where designated DHCP server
+   hosts allocate network addresses and deliver configuration parameters
+   to dynamically configured hosts.  Throughout the remainder of this
+   document, the term "server" refers to a host providing initialization
+   parameters through DHCP, and the term "client" refers to a host
+   requesting initialization parameters from a DHCP server.
+
+   A host should not act as a DHCP server unless explicitly configured
+   to do so by a system administrator.  The diversity of hardware and
+   protocol implementations in the Internet would preclude reliable
+   operation if random hosts were allowed to respond to DHCP requests.
+   For example, IP requires the setting of many parameters within the
+   protocol implementation software.  Because IP can be used on many
+   dissimilar kinds of network hardware, values for those parameters
+   cannot be guessed or assumed to have correct defaults.  Also,
+   distributed address allocation schemes depend on a polling/defense
+
+
+
+Droms                       Standards Track                     [Page 2]
+
+RFC 2131          Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol         March 1997
+
+
+   mechanism for discovery of addresses that are already in use.  IP
+   hosts may not always be able to defend their network addresses, so
+   that such a distributed address allocation scheme cannot be
+   guaranteed to avoid allocation of duplicate network addresses.
+
+   DHCP supports three mechanisms for IP address allocation.  In
+   "automatic allocation", DHCP assigns a permanent IP address to a
+   client.  In "dynamic allocation", DHCP assigns an IP address to a
+   client for a limited period of time (or until the client explicitly
+   relinquishes the address).  In "manual allocation", a client's IP
+   address is assigned by the network administrator, and DHCP is used
+   simply to convey the assigned address to the client.  A particular
+   network will use one or more of these mechanisms, depending on the
+   policies of the network administrator.
+
+   Dynamic allocation is the only one of the three mechanisms that
+   allows automatic reuse of an address that is no longer needed by the
+   client to which it was assigned.  Thus, dynamic allocation is
+   particularly useful for assigning an address to a client that will be
+   connected to the network only temporarily or for sharing a limited
+   pool of IP addresses among a group of clients that do not need
+   permanent IP addresses.  Dynamic allocation may also be a good choice
+   for assigning an IP address to a new client being permanently
+   connected to a network where IP addresses are sufficiently scarce
+   that it is important to reclaim them when old clients are retired.
+   Manual allocation allows DHCP to be used to eliminate the error-prone
+   process of manually configuring hosts with IP addresses in
+   environments where (for whatever reasons) it is desirable to manage
+   IP address assignment outside of the DHCP mechanisms.
+
+   The format of DHCP messages is based on the format of BOOTP messages,
+   to capture the BOOTP relay agent behavior described as part of the
+   BOOTP specification [7, 21] and to allow interoperability of existing
+   BOOTP clients with DHCP servers.  Using BOOTP relay agents eliminates
+   the necessity of having a DHCP server on each physical network
+   segment.
+
+1.1 Changes to RFC 1541
+
+   This document updates the DHCP protocol specification that appears in
+   RFC1541.  A new DHCP message type, DHCPINFORM, has been added; see
+   section 3.4, 4.3 and 4.4 for details.  The classing mechanism for
+   identifying DHCP clients to DHCP servers has been extended to include
+   "vendor" classes as defined in sections 4.2 and 4.3.  The minimum
+   lease time restriction has been removed.  Finally, many editorial
+   changes have been made to clarify the text as a result of experience
+   gained in DHCP interoperability tests.
+
+
+
+
+Droms                       Standards Track                     [Page 3]
+
+RFC 2131          Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol         March 1997
+
+
+1.2 Related Work
+
+   There are several Internet protocols and related mechanisms that
+   address some parts of the dynamic host configuration problem.  The
+   Reverse Address Resolution Protocol (RARP) [10] (through the
+   extensions defined in the Dynamic RARP (DRARP) [5]) explicitly
+   addresses the problem of network address discovery, and includes an
+   automatic IP address assignment mechanism.  The Trivial File Transfer
+   Protocol (TFTP) [20] provides for transport of a boot image from a
+   boot server.  The Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) [16]
+   provides for informing hosts of additional routers via "ICMP
+   redirect" messages.  ICMP also can provide subnet mask information
+   through the "ICMP mask request" message and other information through
+   the (obsolete) "ICMP information request" message.  Hosts can locate
+   routers through the ICMP router discovery mechanism [8].
+
+   BOOTP is a transport mechanism for a collection of configuration
+   information.  BOOTP is also extensible, and official extensions [17]
+   have been defined for several configuration parameters.  Morgan has
+   proposed extensions to BOOTP for dynamic IP address assignment [15].
+   The Network Information Protocol (NIP), used by the Athena project at
+   MIT, is a distributed mechanism for dynamic IP address assignment
+   [19].  The Resource Location Protocol RLP [1] provides for location
+   of higher level services.  Sun Microsystems diskless workstations use
+   a boot procedure that employs RARP, TFTP and an RPC mechanism called
+   "bootparams" to deliver configuration information and operating
+   system code to diskless hosts.  (Sun Microsystems, Sun Workstation
+   and SunOS are trademarks of Sun Microsystems, Inc.)  Some Sun
+   networks also use DRARP and an auto-installation mechanism to
+   automate the configuration of new hosts in an existing network.
+
+   In other related work, the path minimum transmission unit (MTU)
+   discovery algorithm can determine the MTU of an arbitrary internet
+   path [14].  The Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) has been proposed
+   as a transport protocol for resource location and selection [6].
+   Finally, the Host Requirements RFCs [3, 4] mention specific
+   requirements for host reconfiguration and suggest a scenario for
+   initial configuration of diskless hosts.
+
+1.3 Problem definition and issues
+
+   DHCP is designed to supply DHCP clients with the configuration
+   parameters defined in the Host Requirements RFCs.  After obtaining
+   parameters via DHCP, a DHCP client should be able to exchange packets
+   with any other host in the Internet.  The TCP/IP stack parameters
+   supplied by DHCP are listed in Appendix A.
+
+
+
+
+
+Droms                       Standards Track                     [Page 4]
+
+RFC 2131          Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol         March 1997
+
+
+   Not all of these parameters are required for a newly initialized
+   client.  A client and server may negotiate for the transmission of
+   only those parameters required by the client or specific to a
+   particular subnet.
+
+   DHCP allows but does not require the configuration of client
+   parameters not directly related to the IP protocol.  DHCP also does
+   not address registration of newly configured clients with the Domain
+   Name System (DNS) [12, 13].
+
+   DHCP is not intended for use in configuring routers.
+
+1.4 Requirements
+
+   Throughout this document, the words that are used to define the
+   significance of particular requirements are capitalized.  These words
+   are:
+
+      o "MUST"
+
+        This word or the adjective "REQUIRED" means that the
+        item is an absolute requirement of this specification.
+
+      o "MUST NOT"
+
+        This phrase means that the item is an absolute prohibition
+        of this specification.
+
+      o "SHOULD"
+
+        This word or the adjective "RECOMMENDED" means that there
+        may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to ignore
+        this item, but the full implications should be understood and
+        the case carefully weighed before choosing a different course.
+
+      o "SHOULD NOT"
+
+        This phrase means that there may exist valid reasons in
+        particular circumstances when the listed behavior is acceptable
+        or even useful, but the full implications should be understood
+        and the case carefully weighed before implementing any behavior
+        described with this label.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Droms                       Standards Track                     [Page 5]
+
+RFC 2131          Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol         March 1997
+
+
+      o "MAY"
+
+        This word or the adjective "OPTIONAL" means that this item is
+        truly optional.  One vendor may choose to include the item
+        because a particular marketplace requires it or because it
+        enhances the product, for example; another vendor may omit the
+        same item.
+
+1.5 Terminology
+
+   This document uses the following terms:
+
+      o "DHCP client"
+
+      A DHCP client is an Internet host using DHCP to obtain
+      configuration parameters such as a network address.
+
+      o "DHCP server"
+
+      A DHCP server is an Internet host that returns configuration
+      parameters to DHCP clients.
+
+      o "BOOTP relay agent"
+
+      A BOOTP relay agent or relay agent is an Internet host or router
+      that passes DHCP messages between DHCP clients and DHCP servers.
+      DHCP is designed to use the same relay agent behavior as specified
+      in the BOOTP protocol specification.
+
+      o "binding"
+
+      A binding is a collection of configuration parameters, including
+      at least an IP address, associated with or "bound to" a DHCP
+      client.  Bindings are managed by DHCP servers.
+
+1.6 Design goals
+
+   The following list gives general design goals for DHCP.
+
+      o DHCP should be a mechanism rather than a policy.  DHCP must
+        allow local system administrators control over configuration
+        parameters where desired; e.g., local system administrators
+        should be able to enforce local policies concerning allocation
+        and access to local resources where desired.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Droms                       Standards Track                     [Page 6]
+
+RFC 2131          Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol         March 1997
+
+
+      o Clients should require no manual configuration.  Each client
+        should be able to discover appropriate local configuration
+        parameters without user intervention and incorporate those
+        parameters into its own configuration.
+
+      o Networks should require no manual configuration for individual
+        clients.  Under normal circumstances, the network manager
+        should not have to enter any per-client configuration
+        parameters.
+
+      o DHCP should not require a server on each subnet.  To allow for
+        scale and economy, DHCP must work across routers or through the
+        intervention of BOOTP relay agents.
+
+      o A DHCP client must be prepared to receive multiple responses
+        to a request for configuration parameters.  Some installations
+        may include multiple, overlapping DHCP servers to enhance
+        reliability and increase performance.
+
+      o DHCP must coexist with statically configured, non-participating
+        hosts and with existing network protocol implementations.
+
+      o DHCP must interoperate with the BOOTP relay agent behavior as
+        described by RFC 951 and by RFC 1542 [21].
+
+      o DHCP must provide service to existing BOOTP clients.
+
+   The following list gives design goals specific to the transmission of
+   the network layer parameters.  DHCP must:
+
+      o Guarantee that any specific network address will not be in
+        use by more than one DHCP client at a time,
+
+      o Retain DHCP client configuration across DHCP client reboot.  A
+        DHCP client should, whenever possible, be assigned the same
+        configuration parameters (e.g., network address) in response
+        to each request,
+
+      o Retain DHCP client configuration across server reboots, and,
+        whenever possible, a DHCP client should be assigned the same
+        configuration parameters despite restarts of the DHCP mechanism,
+
+      o Allow automated assignment of configuration parameters to new
+        clients to avoid hand configuration for new clients,
+
+      o Support fixed or permanent allocation of configuration
+        parameters to specific clients.
+
+
+
+
+Droms                       Standards Track                     [Page 7]
_______________________________________________
Commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.moblin.org/mailman/listinfo/commits

Reply via email to