mozga-intel commented on a change in pull request #20724:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/20724#discussion_r744798383



##########
File path: src/operator/subgraph/dnnl/dnnl_post_quantize_property.h
##########
@@ -20,146 +20,209 @@
 #define MXNET_OPERATOR_SUBGRAPH_DNNL_DNNL_POST_QUANTIZE_PROPERTY_H_
 #if MXNET_USE_ONEDNN == 1
 
+#include <memory>
 #include <set>
 #include <string>
 #include <vector>
 
 #include "../../nn/dnnl/dnnl_convolution-inl.h"
+#include "../../nn/fully_connected-inl.h"
 #include "../../quantization/requantize-inl.h"
+#include "../../tensor/elemwise_binary_op-inl.h"
 #include "../common.h"
 #include "dnnl_conv-inl.h"
 #include "dnnl_subgraph_base-inl.h"
 
 namespace mxnet {
 namespace op {
 
-class SgDNNLPostQuantizeSelector : public SubgraphSelector {
+const std::set<std::string> support_req_fusion_op = 
{"_contrib_quantized_elemwise_add",
+                                                     
"_contrib_quantized_elemwise_mul",
+                                                     
"_contrib_quantized_npi_add",
+                                                     "_sg_onednn_conv",
+                                                     
"_sg_onednn_fully_connected",
+                                                     "_sg_onednn_selfatt_qk",
+                                                     
"_sg_onednn_selfatt_valatt",
+                                                     "_sg_onednn_batch_dot"};
+
+class SgDNNLPostQuantizeSelector : public SubgraphSelectorV2 {
  public:
   /*! \brief pattern match status */
   enum SelectStatus {

Review comment:
       [Future consideration] It could be fine to replace plain enum with class 
enum - to avoid implicitly conversion to other types (like another enum or int)




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to