guanxinq commented on a change in pull request #17569: Adding sparse support to 
MXTensor for custom operators
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/17569#discussion_r387352445
 
 

 ##########
 File path: include/mxnet/lib_api.h
 ##########
 @@ -1111,18 +1171,63 @@ extern "C" {
 
     // create a vector of tensors for inputs
     std::vector<MXTensor> inputs(num_in);
+
+    MXStorageType type;
+    void *data = nullptr;
+    void *data2 = nullptr;
+    MXSparse sparse;
+    MXSparse sparse2;
     for (int i = 0; i < num_in; i++) {
-      inputs[i].setTensor(indata[i], (MXDType)intypes[i], inshapes[i], 
indims[i],
-                          inIDs[i], {indev_type[i], indev_id[i]});
+      // Dense representation.
+      if(!in_indices_shapes) {
+        type = kDefaultStorage;
+       data = indata[i]; 
+      }
+      // Sparse representation.
+      else {
+        // To do: remove if else.
+       if(!in_indptr_shapes) {
+          type = kRowSparseStorage;
+         sparse.set(indata[i], inshapes[i], indims[i], in_indices[i], 
in_indices_shapes[i]);
+        }
+        else {
+          type = kCSRStorage;
+          sparse.set(indata[i], inshapes[i], indims[i], in_indices[i],
+                      in_indices_shapes[i], in_indptr[i], in_indptr_shapes[i]);
+        }
+       data = (void*)(&sparse);
 
 Review comment:
   Thanks Sam. I know the overwrite issue which is fixed now. I am thinking 
about how to handle MXSparse and the set() function to make it more reasonable. 
Will update later.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to