ciyongch commented on pull request #18648: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18648#issuecomment-652355926
As numpy operator feature is in a quite active development in current master branch and mainly targeting on 2.0 release. It'll be fine if the backport patch is small and controllable at this time frame, but given the current one is introducing substantial modifications (+16,079 −1,160 code changes in 192 files), which is really a big concern whether this patch can help to make it solid enough while not introducing any other numpy issue. I agree to include existing fixes as much as possible, but this one is kind of complicated and need further confirmation. What do you think @szha @sandeep-krishnamurthy ? [Quote](https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/18641#issuecomment-651498541) from @sandeep-krishnamurthy >+1 to mark this as experimental as it was not stable in 1.6 or advertised as will be stable in v1.7. We are mainly looking at numpy ops in 2.0. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
