lanking520 edited a comment on issue #17783: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/17783#issuecomment-663137329
@saudet Thanks for your proposal. I have four questions would like to ask you: 1. If we adopt JavaCpp package, how will that be consumed? Under byteco or apache MXNet? Essentially from our previous discussion, we really don't want another 3rdparty checkin. 2. Can you also do a benchmark on the MXNet's API's performance and possibly share the reproducible code? We did test the performance on JavaCpp vs JNA vs JNI and didn't see much difference on performance (under 10%). 3. We do have some additional technical issue with JavaCpp, is there any plan to fix it? (I will put it into a separate comment since it is really big. 4. How do you ensure the performance if the build flag is different? Like the mxnet has to build from source in order to work along with javacpp 5. regarding to the dependencies issue, can we go without additional opencv and openblas in the package? ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
