kpuatamazon commented on issue #18699:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/18699#issuecomment-664253978


   Ran these in a loop over the weekend with 136 samples. 
   
   keep 83b5170  | a | b | c | justc++ |  
   -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | --
   301.324 | 298.468 | 294.094 | 301.243 | 289.476 | AVG
   19.978 | 20.590 | 19.759 | 20.746 | 19.351 | Sample stddev
   266.168 | 262.355 | 260.640 | 266.384 | 255.469 | Min
   287.478 | 284.945 | 279.012 | 288.021 | 278.632 | Q1
   307.157 | 303.188 | 297.966 | 306.039 | 294.594 | Median
   
   Running a 1-tailed t-test assuming the same variance, we can say that the 
new version of `python/mxnet/gluon/parameter.py` (included in "keep 83b5170") 
is slower than the old version (in "b") with 99.8% confidence.  There may also 
be other effects like a) seems to be slower than justc++ but I can't say it's 
significantly slower.  
   
   [Raw 
data](https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/files/4981297/timing.txt)
   


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to