szha commented on a change in pull request #9977: Cpu lstm inference
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/9977#discussion_r173524502
 
 

 ##########
 File path: tests/python/unittest/test_gluon_rnn.py
 ##########
 @@ -67,6 +67,22 @@ def test_lstm_forget_bias():
                                forget_bias * np.ones(100, ), np.zeros((2 * 
100,))])
     assert_allclose(mod.get_params()[0][bias_argument].asnumpy(), 
expected_bias)
 
+def test_lstm_cpu_inference():
+    # should behave the same as lstm cell
+    atol = 1e-6
+    x = mx.nd.ones(shape=(2, 2, 2))
+    model = mx.gluon.nn.Sequential()
+    with model.name_scope():
+        model.add(mx.gluon.rnn.LSTM(2, num_layers=6, bidirectional=True))
+    model.initialize(mx.init.One())
 
 Review comment:
   Under the current input and weight, your test would still pass even if the 
weights are iterated backwards. Unfortunately it's not in an acceptable state.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to