anirudh2290 opened a new pull request #14677: Fix profiler check URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/14677 ## Description ## After adding the waitall PR the nightlies started failing and was reported here : https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/14397#issuecomment-481821129 This was because waitall rethrowing exceptions that were hidden earlier. Seems like operator-= for ProfileCounter is called during frees which checks if the amount to be freed is greater than alloced. Added a check before operator is called. More permanent fix would be to understand why memory pool counters are incorrect when free is called but this PR should stop the profiler nightly test failures. ## Checklist ## ### Essentials ### Please feel free to remove inapplicable items for your PR. - [ ] The PR title starts with [MXNET-$JIRA_ID], where $JIRA_ID refers to the relevant [JIRA issue](https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MXNET/issues) created (except PRs with tiny changes) - [ ] Changes are complete (i.e. I finished coding on this PR) - [ ] All changes have test coverage: - Unit tests are added for small changes to verify correctness (e.g. adding a new operator) - Nightly tests are added for complicated/long-running ones (e.g. changing distributed kvstore) - Build tests will be added for build configuration changes (e.g. adding a new build option with NCCL) - [ ] Code is well-documented: - For user-facing API changes, API doc string has been updated. - For new C++ functions in header files, their functionalities and arguments are documented. - For new examples, README.md is added to explain the what the example does, the source of the dataset, expected performance on test set and reference to the original paper if applicable - Check the API doc at http://mxnet-ci-doc.s3-accelerate.dualstack.amazonaws.com/PR-$PR_ID/$BUILD_ID/index.html - [ ] To the my best knowledge, examples are either not affected by this change, or have been fixed to be compatible with this change ### Changes ### - [ ] Feature1, tests, (and when applicable, API doc) - [ ] Feature2, tests, (and when applicable, API doc) ## Comments ## - If this change is a backward incompatible change, why must this change be made. - Interesting edge cases to note here
---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] With regards, Apache Git Services
