samskalicky commented on issue #9686: [Discussion] MXNet 2.0 Roadmap (was: APIs that might be a good idea to break in 2.0) URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/9686#issuecomment-513097695 @szha I agree the third-party operator support I [proposed](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Dynamic+CustomOp+Support) could be more useful to the broader community and have been continually working on it in my spare time. I would be interested in collaborating with others to move this along faster. Should we consider that as part of the 1.6 release? But subgraph API + operator support does not serve the same goal as the accelerator API. Some additional external APIs (like external subgraph properties for example, or supporting compiled binaries for subgraphs) would be needed to serve the same goal.
---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] With regards, Apache Git Services
