[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-1396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16955497#comment-16955497
]
Thomas Zimmermann edited comment on NETBEANS-1396 at 10/26/19 9:49 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[~jgneff]
You are correct, the Javadoc isn't used because of a silly bug, see my PR with
the fix
[here|https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/1548/commits/b02c59fda5f962f071e77f920c2115b7940f4a4d#diff-f1b8dd6458da9fb8ddb0ba46d941d35dL266].
NetBeans is looking for `javafx-graphics-13-.jar-javadoc.jar` instead of
`javafx-graphics-13-linux-javadoc.jar`. Even if that was fixed though, OpenJFX
uses the new HTML output format from javadoc 9+ and NetBeans doesn't parse that
correctly yet. And even if it parsed that correctly, OpenJFX stores the HTML
pages in the javadoc jars prefixed by module name, so NetBeans wouldn't find
them. All this is fixed in my PR. I don't want to rush the nice NetBeans
developers though, it seems like they want to get 11.2 out and this isn't that
critical IMO.
was (Author: zimmi):
[~jgneff]
You are correct, the Javadoc isn't used because of a silly bug, see my PR with
the fix
[here|https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/1548/commits/ff152ec70ab53081d0470c97ffb065f880d733fb#diff-f1b8dd6458da9fb8ddb0ba46d941d35dR266].
NetBeans is looking for `javafx-graphics-13-.jar-javadoc.jar` instead of
`javafx-graphics-13-linux-javadoc.jar`. Even if that was fixed though, OpenJFX
uses the new HTML output format from javadoc 9+ and NetBeans doesn't parse that
correctly yet. And even if it parsed that correctly, OpenJFX stores the HTML
pages in the javadoc jars prefixed by module name, so NetBeans wouldn't find
them. All this is fixed in my PR. I don't want to rush the nice NetBeans
developers though, it seems like they want to get 11.2 out and this isn't that
critical IMO.
> Maven: Downloaded javadoc / sources not attached to artifact with classifier
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: NETBEANS-1396
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-1396
> Project: NetBeans
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Thomas Zimmermann
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Attachments: javafx11-javadoc-sources-download.zip
>
> Time Spent: 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The Maven artifacts org.openjfx:javafx-controls and friends use a jar with
> classifier for each operating system for the actual classes, javafx-controls
> is only an empty shell. If I understand correctly, sources / javadoc are
> attached in maven by having additional artifacts with the classifiers
> "sources" and "javadoc". Both are available for javafx-controls etc., but
> NetBeans doesn't use them for javafx-controls (linux) (the platform specific
> version with the actual classes). I think that's a bug, NetBeans should use
> the sources and javadoc artifacts for all artifacts of the same groupId +
> artifactId.
> Steps to reproduce:
> # Download attached maven project
> # Right click Dependencies -> Download Javadoc + Download Sources
> # Open App.java, see that no source / docs are attached for
> javafx.application.Application
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
